4.2 sec in total
1.1 sec
3 sec
173 ms
Welcome to ascendeum.com homepage info - get ready to check Ascendeum best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ascendeum.com
Plan, shape, and manage the mechanics of your digital advertising infrastructure.
Visit ascendeum.comWe analyzed Ascendeum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ascendeum.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
1058 ms
24 ms
197 ms
228 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Ascendeum.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ascendeum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 103.5 kB (76%)
136.6 kB
33.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ascendeum.com main page is 136.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 83.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (88%)
60
7
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ascendeum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ascendeum.com
1058 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
197 ms
layerslider.css
228 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
222 ms
nivo-slider.css
215 ms
jquery-ui.css
224 ms
icons.css
223 ms
style.css
527 ms
editor-content.css
362 ms
jquery.js
525 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
375 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
553 ms
greensock.js
516 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
570 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
570 ms
combobox-front.js
662 ms
checkbox.js
689 ms
jquery.radio.js
675 ms
scripts.js
676 ms
modernizr.custom.js
689 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
705 ms
drop-down-menu.js
817 ms
jquery.easing.js
824 ms
jquery.lazyLoading.js
827 ms
jquery.transform.js
823 ms
effect.min.js
831 ms
effect-drop.min.js
838 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
963 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1021 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
970 ms
widget.min.js
971 ms
core.min.js
978 ms
mouse.min.js
984 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
1116 ms
position.min.js
1117 ms
accordion.min.js
1122 ms
tabs.min.js
1124 ms
collect
14 ms
jquery-ui-init.js
933 ms
jquery.carouFredSel.js
1037 ms
clients.js
1054 ms
diagram_line.js
1056 ms
raphael.js
1198 ms
diagram_circle.js
1056 ms
gallery.js
926 ms
jquery.juraSlider.js
1023 ms
portfolio.js
907 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
945 ms
jquery.flatshadow.js
867 ms
quickfinder.js
866 ms
styled_image.js
959 ms
testimonials.js
983 ms
loading.js
903 ms
wp-embed.min.js
906 ms
Ascendeum-Medium.jpg-e1441847853194.jpeg
1008 ms
blank.gif
974 ms
aileron-ultralight-webfont.woff
1048 ms
collect
4 ms
aileron-light-webfont.woff
1046 ms
Codeus-Icons.ttf
1017 ms
aileron-thin-webfont.woff
1013 ms
Codeus-Socials.ttf
945 ms
Codeus.ttf
1012 ms
preloader.gif
1054 ms
skin.css
254 ms
ascendeum.com accessibility score
ascendeum.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ascendeum.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ascendeum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ascendeum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ascendeum.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ascendeum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: