2.2 sec in total
122 ms
1.9 sec
239 ms
Welcome to asthmacontrol.com homepage info - get ready to check Asthmacontrol best content right away, or after learning these important things about asthmacontrol.com
GSK - Resource not available or no longer active
Visit asthmacontrol.comWe analyzed Asthmacontrol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
asthmacontrol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
93/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
122 ms
191 ms
778 ms
10 ms
118 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Asthmacontrol.com, 65% (34 requests) were made to Asthma.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Nexus.ensighten.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (778 ms) relates to the external source Asthma.com.
Page size can be reduced by 955.5 kB (69%)
1.4 MB
424.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Asthmacontrol.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 982.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.4 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Asthmacontrol needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 663.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 663.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 173.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Asthmacontrol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 173.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)
46
18
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asthmacontrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
asthmacontrol.com
122 ms
asthma-control-test.html
191 ms
asthma-control-test.html
778 ms
Bootstrap.js
10 ms
ext.jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.css
118 ms
ext.bootstrap-3.0.3.min.css
150 ms
clientlibs_common.min.css
83 ms
clientlibs_rwd.min.css
116 ms
ext.jquery-1.10.2.min.js
191 ms
ext.jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.js
188 ms
ext.bootstrap-3.0.3.min.js
122 ms
ext.bootbox-4.2.0.min.js
144 ms
ext.device-0.0.1.min.js
163 ms
clientlibs_common.min.js
164 ms
clientlibs_rwd.min.js
181 ms
addthis_widget.js
60 ms
serverComponent.php
71 ms
e88c60cbe58f1fd10f054a73354e7519.js
8 ms
activityi;src=3287338;type=asthm00;cat=asthm000;ord=9991945566143.84
173 ms
hdrLogoAsthma.png
101 ms
search_btn.png
99 ms
imgCallTakeACT.jpg
100 ms
btnCallTakeACT.png
100 ms
btnUtilityShare.png
98 ms
circle-filled1.png
99 ms
arrow_btn.png
101 ms
startover_btn.png
100 ms
hdlUtilityToolbox.png
142 ms
iconToolboxAsthmaControl.png
148 ms
close_tools.gif
141 ms
iconToolboxDrDiscussionGuide.png
148 ms
iconToolboxAsthmaJournal.png
147 ms
iconToolboxActionPlan.png
153 ms
iconToolboxTrueFalse.png
185 ms
ftrCallContactUs.png
190 ms
gsk-logo.png
191 ms
300lo.json
60 ms
conversion.js
48 ms
down_arrow.png
91 ms
footerfooter_corner_bg.png
97 ms
nav.png
97 ms
nav_selected.png
116 ms
gw.js
158 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
46 ms
57 ms
59 ms
s77547649638727
38 ms
37 ms
57 ms
38 ms
20 ms
392833.js
82 ms
asthmacontrol.com accessibility score
asthmacontrol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
asthmacontrol.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Asthmacontrol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Asthmacontrol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
asthmacontrol.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Asthmacontrol. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: