11.3 sec in total
2.6 sec
8.6 sec
185 ms
Visit autoscannerreviews.net now to see the best up-to-date Auto Scanner Reviews content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about autoscannerreviews.net
Auto Scanner Reviews & Consumer complaints, Auto Scanner Ratings information, tips, videos and more. 2011
Visit autoscannerreviews.netWe analyzed Autoscannerreviews.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
autoscannerreviews.net performance score
2571 ms
146 ms
143 ms
801 ms
799 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Autoscannerreviews.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Autoscannerreviews.net.
Page size can be reduced by 157.7 kB (33%)
481.4 kB
323.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Autoscannerreviews.net main page is 481.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 227.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Auto Scanner Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 84.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Autoscannerreviews.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (73%)
63
17
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Auto Scanner Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.autoscannerreviews.net
2571 ms
style.css
146 ms
skin.css
143 ms
social-discussions-post.css
801 ms
social-discussions-networkpub.css
799 ms
social-discussions-socialstats.css
1042 ms
social-discussions-redmond_mod.css
801 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
54 ms
social-discussions.js
788 ms
swfobject.js
1052 ms
jquery.js
1822 ms
sexy-bookmarks-public.js
901 ms
shareaholic-perf.js
893 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1730 ms
slidedeck.jquery.lite.pack.js
1397 ms
default.css
1767 ms
jd.gallery.css.php
2291 ms
jd.gallery.css
2086 ms
mootools.v1.11.js
1753 ms
jd.gallery.js.php
2345 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.js
1833 ms
ga.js
27 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
background.gif
100 ms
header.jpg
205 ms
content-bg.gif
98 ms
spines.png
88 ms
slides.png
74 ms
slide-auto-scanner-Equus-3160-Innova-OBDII.jpg
239 ms
slide-auto-scanner-Actron-CP91501.jpg
315 ms
thumb-Actron-CP9150-AutoScanner-Diagnostic-Code-Scanner-Kit.jpg
160 ms
read-review.gif
165 ms
view-website.gif
165 ms
thumb-Equus-3160.jpg
230 ms
thumb-Equus-3140.jpg
238 ms
thumb-Actron-CP9580.jpg
246 ms
sidebar-header.gif
267 ms
flag_en.png
322 ms
flag_it.png
324 ms
flag_ko.png
315 ms
flag_zh-CN.png
316 ms
flag_zh-TW.png
333 ms
flag_pt.png
370 ms
flag_de.png
387 ms
flag_fr.png
380 ms
flag_es.png
388 ms
flag_ar.png
394 ms
flag_hi.png
398 ms
flag_iw.png
436 ms
flag_ga.png
447 ms
flag_fa.png
453 ms
ca-pub-9744670029338378.js
518 ms
zrt_lookup.html
47 ms
show_ads_impl.js
66 ms
bullet.gif
424 ms
footer.gif
431 ms
lite
167 ms
corner.png
407 ms
indexes.png
442 ms
ads
21 ms
osd.js
8 ms
autoscannerreviews.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Autoscannerreviews.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Autoscannerreviews.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
autoscannerreviews.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Auto Scanner Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: