Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

caloriecount.about.com

Calorie Counter and Food Nutrition Data

Page Load Speed

50.2 sec in total

First Response

899 ms

Resources Loaded

29.6 sec

Page Rendered

19.7 sec

caloriecount.about.com screenshot

About Website

Visit caloriecount.about.com now to see the best up-to-date Calorie Count About content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about caloriecount.about.com

Verywell Fit offers free food nutrition data. Learn ways to incorporate nutrient-rich meals and make better-informed diet choices.

Visit caloriecount.about.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Caloriecount.about.com page load time and found that the first response time was 899 ms and then it took 49.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

caloriecount.about.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.518

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

calorie-counts-and-nutrition-facts-4118141

899 ms

gpt.js

3359 ms

eNqdVFGSgyAMvdAyHmJ_9xKIEZnFpAO43d5-A2hXLJVOP2ryXvMiCTGdDzIY1Snvu1ka_Og2guYLIWDwnRzSr_bX1Qwa2E5g9BQ-J4kavowPgOCqZC2JttRLy-FySKpoTuIsaUqPWgzKH6OZJOzGxVqvHAAKZg-woe0dn0K5Ze793q-pRnKzZwIHE6XCg3RqeiCeS3Xsi7SbsIQ1mQcVE_suSO3FigrQqC6Fxp5sztnVelImHmeSDvKYYGC4Y19Wt0T9EkKsK74lly8ydTINI1HgqcnmeZMRrt5C4Bjhjcbl8shUm_am7L_Xa80jWUvXEjWUF2dm6W7ponZ-a-pTI4Q1-O0LUG24JcVhE08pUjCjUTnJkTjTgiMRaQu_BWh9YVGeart71d3jmLCw2RdCxLpH9tCgPuI3Ms0QZAHOcvQ37vpmWsPO14vhZNaPB-Plwts08Pf7S0jz7e40mm4wnkasV1egmtLy0l4vWkR_555MRDL5ebq9tmJS5j1o7LxcaZYV6HkJ8QPIgrv3B44uskQ.min.css

287 ms

eNp1kFESgjAMRC9kp3fwx1_H4QKlZEoEGkxSGD29xUEtDv519u0m6VpRp-jtVewEsSG23qlvR8KoRjzjqAf79dQMrntBKeU1OlADHPHBH-ZpGClCttuaZsjTiToEMTm0Pv97bwn4LsoYg21QtBTK7UmxRy1HZbEF12trdtnpXO1cry2Tag8lYsgwQcXOdz9b33UlURrM4ts0damOez9zjSw0bGsdXQAzIcx7kaDD4vE9-s7oeskT0KCm_A.min.js

625 ms

eNqdVF1axCAMvJDIGdRX3zxBCillS8NK6K7d0xvadX_p-ukTyXRmSAJUc4bsjTZx2EZCyqybuMekN58jpum4POk1WoDDxP6AfI5O5A3rgXL4MCmGULPwlDERBG2xLVvyEiS06xtuvcljwtYHkXnOl8BDVQ8WMurgmznD9Df2c8lrEhjgEElBKxV44agMzi3drHyqueDXMgoZoAqeei76O7Cm7BBsMZbtrARRdXFANgmR5hpuwZrH3luHs5d3XX7rgBy-y3CRpJEaWDNxITZylqWeWVWWGo9g552AkXQ7hrBUpQS9SS_v0Q7JxqTztEUozjXfNqaBBSDri7lihGS6O2Bd6kpnEH6E1-kvnTRJqjJpHBq-jOXYOD-aOEfjyx4dJLxK1PoAq9rNdb7eJeGeA2a5WYq9o3F7j1R7_Z9seVAsaD-p3ufjD-X5jFTflJ3vf4imf5V33URIlh8QIQke8KVOKmcglRS3-TwuwnV6eW8L-xR9A3oC_u8.min.js

622 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Caloriecount.about.com, 18% (7 requests) were made to Fthmb.tqn.com and 13% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.2 sec) relates to the external source G.3gl.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 562.9 kB (59%)

Content Size

954.4 kB

After Optimization

391.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Caloriecount.about.com main page is 954.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 681.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 159.2 kB

  • Original 202.7 kB
  • After minification 176.9 kB
  • After compression 43.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 70.4 kB
  • After minification 70.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Calorie Count About images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 403.7 kB

  • Original 681.3 kB
  • After minification 681.2 kB
  • After compression 277.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 403.7 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (66%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Calorie Count About. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

caloriecount.about.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

caloriecount.about.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

caloriecount.about.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caloriecount.about.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Caloriecount.about.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Calorie Count About. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: