Tools & Wizards About Us
cookandboardman.applicantpro.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

327 ms

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cookandboardman Applicantpro content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cookandboardman.applicantpro.com

See current career opportunities that are available at The Cook & Boardman Group, LLC

Visit cookandboardman.applicantpro.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cookandboardman.applicantpro.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

212 ms

all.min.css

258 ms

all.min.js

323 ms

refer_io_widget.js

64 ms

CookBoardman_footer.jpg

466 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Cookandboardman.applicantpro.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Widget-dot-refer-io.appspot.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Appdocs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 276.7 kB (44%)

Content Size

634.7 kB

After Optimization

357.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cookandboardman.applicantpro.com main page is 634.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 274.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

  • Original 274.6 kB
  • After minification 251.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cookandboardman Applicantpro images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 138.4 kB

  • Original 220.9 kB
  • After minification 215.9 kB
  • After compression 82.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 92.0 kB

  • Original 110.3 kB
  • After minification 108.5 kB
  • After compression 18.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cookandboardman.applicantpro.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (29%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cookandboardman Applicantpro. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

212 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

258 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

323 ms

refer_io_widget.js

refer_io_widget.js

64 ms

CookBoardman_footer.jpg

CookBoardman_footer.jpg

466 ms

CookBoardman_bkg.jpg

CookBoardman_bkg.jpg

351 ms

CookBoardman_header.jpg

CookBoardman_header.jpg

461 ms

facebook_new.png

facebook_new.png

227 ms

twitter_new.png

twitter_new.png

234 ms

linkedin_icon_new.png

linkedin_icon_new.png

220 ms

envelope.png

envelope.png

235 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

27 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

383 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

269 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

46 ms

jquery.popupWindow.js

jquery.popupWindow.js

80 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

45 ms

Accessibility Review

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cookandboardman.applicantpro.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cookandboardman.applicantpro.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cookandboardman.applicantpro.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cookandboardman Applicantpro. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: