Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

r.email.artboard.studio

Brevo | CRM Suite

Page Load Speed

977 ms in total

First Response

107 ms

Resources Loaded

628 ms

Page Rendered

242 ms

r.email.artboard.studio screenshot

About Website

Welcome to r.email.artboard.studio homepage info - get ready to check R Email Artboard best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about r.email.artboard.studio

Brevo helps you grow your business. Build customer relationships across email, SMS, chat, and more. Use the tools you need, when you need them. Try it for free.

Visit r.email.artboard.studio

Key Findings

We analyzed R.email.artboard.studio page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 870 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

r.email.artboard.studio performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,950 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.brevo.com

107 ms

gtm.js

293 ms

j.php

58 ms

609e520e1cf47625.css

71 ms

7e3762db088d555c.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original R.email.artboard.studio, 34% (21 requests) were made to Brevo.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Metrics.brevo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (293 ms) relates to the external source Metrics.brevo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 202.5 kB (35%)

Content Size

583.4 kB

After Optimization

380.9 kB

In fact, the total size of R.email.artboard.studio main page is 583.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 349.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 202.4 kB

  • Original 232.5 kB
  • After minification 232.5 kB
  • After compression 30.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 202.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 349.7 kB
  • After minification 349.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Email Artboard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 433 B
  • After minification 433 B
  • After compression 422 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 684 B
  • After minification 684 B
  • After compression 647 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. R.email.artboard.studio has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Email Artboard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

r.email.artboard.studio accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

r.email.artboard.studio best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

r.email.artboard.studio SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R.email.artboard.studio can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that R.email.artboard.studio main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Email Artboard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: