Tools & Wizards About Us
traffic.a4g.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

traffic.a4g.com

A4G.com - Traffic never stops, Neither do we!

Page Load Speed

908 ms in total

First Response

244 ms

Resources Loaded

525 ms

Page Rendered

139 ms

traffic.a4g.com screenshot

About Website

Visit traffic.a4g.com now to see the best up-to-date Traffic A4G content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about traffic.a4g.com

Visit traffic.a4g.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Traffic.a4g.com page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 664 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

traffic.a4g.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

244 ms

jquery.jqmodal.css

22 ms

jquery.autocomplete.css

36 ms

oa.help.css

24 ms

chrome.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Traffic.a4g.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ad4game-a.akamaihd.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Googleadservices.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (244 ms) belongs to the original domain Traffic.a4g.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 436.7 kB (80%)

Content Size

547.0 kB

After Optimization

110.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Traffic.a4g.com main page is 547.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 440.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 619 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Traffic A4G needs image optimization as it can save up to 619 B or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 349.3 kB

  • Original 440.2 kB
  • After minification 263.9 kB
  • After compression 90.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 78.8 kB

  • Original 94.7 kB
  • After minification 71.9 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Traffic.a4g.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (80%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traffic A4G. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

index.php

244 ms

jquery.jqmodal.css

jquery.jqmodal.css

22 ms

jquery.autocomplete.css

jquery.autocomplete.css

36 ms

oa.help.css

oa.help.css

24 ms

chrome.css

chrome.css

47 ms

table.css

table.css

38 ms

message.css

message.css

44 ms

calendar-openads.css

calendar-openads.css

51 ms

interface-ltr.css

interface-ltr.css

58 ms

icons.css

icons.css

63 ms

jquery-1.2.6-mod.js

jquery-1.2.6-mod.js

76 ms

effects.core.js

effects.core.js

65 ms

jquery.bgiframe.js

jquery.bgiframe.js

70 ms

jquery.dimensions.js

jquery.dimensions.js

71 ms

jquery.metadata.js

jquery.metadata.js

73 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

87 ms

jquery.jqmodal.js

jquery.jqmodal.js

85 ms

jquery.typewatch.js

jquery.typewatch.js

85 ms

jquery.autocomplete.js

jquery.autocomplete.js

92 ms

jquery.example.js

jquery.example.js

101 ms

calendar.js

calendar.js

106 ms

calendar-en.js

calendar-en.js

101 ms

calendar-setup.js

calendar-setup.js

103 ms

js-gui.js

js-gui.js

102 ms

boxrow.js

boxrow.js

103 ms

ox.usernamecheck.js

ox.usernamecheck.js

113 ms

ox.addirect.js

ox.addirect.js

116 ms

ox.form.js

ox.form.js

115 ms

ox.help.js

ox.help.js

114 ms

ox.util.js

ox.util.js

118 ms

ox.multicheckbox.js

ox.multicheckbox.js

121 ms

ox.dropdown.js

ox.dropdown.js

124 ms

ox.navigator.js

ox.navigator.js

127 ms

jquery.delegate-1.1.min.js

jquery.delegate-1.1.min.js

128 ms

ox.table.js

ox.table.js

129 ms

jquery.tablesorter.js

jquery.tablesorter.js

133 ms

fl.js

fl.js

61 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

65 ms

ox.tablesorter.plugins.js

ox.tablesorter.plugins.js

129 ms

formValidation.js

formValidation.js

127 ms

40 ms

logo-x.png

logo-x.png

21 ms

tab-body.gif

tab-body.gif

21 ms

tab-lead-in.gif

tab-lead-in.gif

17 ms

tab-lead-out.gif

tab-lead-out.gif

15 ms

background-gradient.gif

background-gradient.gif

17 ms

break-el.gif

break-el.gif

16 ms

38 ms

Accessibility Review

traffic.a4g.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

traffic.a4g.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

traffic.a4g.com SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Traffic.a4g.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Traffic.a4g.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

traffic.a4g.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traffic A4G. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: