3.1 sec in total
323 ms
2.5 sec
311 ms
Welcome to babyforum.com homepage info - get ready to check Babyforum best content right away, or after learning these important things about babyforum.com
Forumhelden betreibt, kauft und vermarktet Foren und Communities als Diskussionsplattform im Internet.
Visit babyforum.comWe analyzed Babyforum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 323 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
babyforum.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
323 ms
649 ms
491 ms
281 ms
331 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Babyforum.com, 16% (12 requests) were made to I.fhcdn.net and 11% (8 requests) were made to Infos.adalizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) belongs to the original domain Babyforum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 357.2 kB (54%)
655.6 kB
298.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Babyforum.com main page is 655.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 207.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Babyforum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 119.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babyforum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (61%)
69
27
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babyforum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
babyforum.com
323 ms
www.babyforum.com
649 ms
fflayout_signinlayer.js
491 ms
lazysizes.min.js
281 ms
search.png
331 ms
forumhome_logo_multibar.png
323 ms
babyforum_header.jpg
408 ms
css.php;styleid=5&langid=2&d=1456762016&td=ltr&embed=1&sheet=bbcode.css,editor.css,popupmenu.css,reset-fonts.css,vbulletin.css,vbulletin-chrome.css,vbulletin-formcontrols.css,advertising.css,flexafc.css,widgets.css,tagcloud.css,sidebar.css,ffsidebar.css,ffblocks_block_html.css,ffblocks_block_ffadvert.css,ffblocks_block_ffadvert.css,ffblocks_block_welcome.css,ffblocks_block_socialbuttons.css,ffblocks_block_ffadvert.css,ffblocks_block_newposts.css,ffblocks_block_tagcloud.css,ffblocks_block_ffadvert.css,fflayout_offscreennav.css,forumbits.css,forumhome.css,options.css,fh_layout.css,fh_layout_sub.css,fh_layout_subsub.css,additional.css,responsive.css,responsive_index.css
433 ms
babyforum_logo.png
472 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
navbit-home.png
358 ms
forum_old-48.png
340 ms
subforum_old-48.png
359 ms
users_online.png
342 ms
forum_stats.png
400 ms
legend.png
466 ms
forum_new-16.png
468 ms
forum_old-16.png
468 ms
category-16.png
469 ms
forum_link-16.png
500 ms
ca-pub-2929172855158067.js
69 ms
zrt_lookup.html
109 ms
show_ads_impl.js
67 ms
cron.php
110 ms
fflayout_signinlayer.js
422 ms
ads
212 ms
osd.js
3 ms
7c158aef480ad5db15fe651f2bcf7cda.png
298 ms
afr.php
299 ms
afr.php
320 ms
e2641dee80983371ac9a9eb71d2a6f9e.jpg
300 ms
abg.js
15 ms
000000_new_ico.gif
22 ms
173 ms
lg.php
98 ms
ca-pub-8108631496310687.js
21 ms
ads
308 ms
lg.php
99 ms
lg.php
176 ms
lg.php
199 ms
abpc.js
293 ms
plusone.js
51 ms
sdk.js
95 ms
ga.js
19 ms
afr.php
157 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
31 ms
fastbutton
128 ms
postmessageRelay
116 ms
ads
409 ms
lg.php
127 ms
193 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
40 ms
Red_Cross_PSA_300x250.jpg
131 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
37 ms
push
167 ms
xd_arbiter.php
106 ms
xd_arbiter.php
207 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
142 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
93 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
135 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
62 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
pixel
13 ms
activeview
27 ms
Red_Cross_PSA_300x600.jpg
41 ms
push
32 ms
cse
270 ms
pixel
11 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
babyforum.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
babyforum.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
babyforum.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babyforum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Babyforum.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
babyforum.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Babyforum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: