9 sec in total
2.1 sec
6.5 sec
321 ms
Click here to check amazing Babymoon Blog content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about babymoonblog.com
Your source for fun pregnancy topics like prenatal shopping, maternity fashion, maternity lingerie, babymoons and much more
Visit babymoonblog.comWe analyzed Babymoonblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
babymoonblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.2 s
1/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.587
11/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
2148 ms
202 ms
209 ms
276 ms
228 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Babymoonblog.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Babymoonblog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.9 kB (22%)
1.2 MB
916.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Babymoonblog.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 797.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Babymoon Blog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 189.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 189.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babymoonblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (52%)
44
21
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babymoon Blog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.babymoonblog.com
2148 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
202 ms
style.css
209 ms
style.css
276 ms
styles.css
228 ms
wp_shopping_cart_style.css
204 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
192 ms
style.css
289 ms
jquery.js
488 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
306 ms
entry-date.js
309 ms
responsive-menu.js
335 ms
jd.gallery.css.php
902 ms
jd.gallery.css
380 ms
mootools.v1.11.js
510 ms
jd.gallery.js.php
2105 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.js
413 ms
core.min.js
451 ms
widget.min.js
518 ms
tabs.min.js
526 ms
jquery.posttabs.js
550 ms
jquery.form.min.js
614 ms
scripts.js
618 ms
jflow.plus.js
647 ms
wp-embed.min.js
706 ms
analytics.js
26 ms
collect
70 ms
babymoon_logo_blog.png
193 ms
panorama_bern-650x348.jpg
613 ms
zik-world-map_01-15-2016_web-360x200.jpg
309 ms
Pictures-Royal-Twins-Monaco-Getting-Baptised-360x200.jpg
325 ms
four_seasons_biltmore_santa_barbara_tydes-360x200.jpg
392 ms
uxua_pool-360x200.jpg
389 ms
florence_dome-360x200.jpg
567 ms
madinat_jumeirah_couple-360x200.jpg
508 ms
panorama_bern-360x200.jpg
598 ms
11-360x200.png
573 ms
PregnantBellyBeach-360x200.jpg
484 ms
babymoon_survey_21.png
668 ms
8-360x200.png
694 ms
7-360x200.png
751 ms
11-360x200.png
692 ms
12-360x200.png
790 ms
1-360x200.png
720 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
8 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
9 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
12 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
7 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
8 ms
ssi-icomoon.woff
630 ms
babymoonblog.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
babymoonblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
babymoonblog.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babymoonblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Babymoonblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
babymoonblog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Babymoon Blog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: