Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

babyzip.com

Registrant WHOIS contact information verification | Namecheap.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

397 ms

Resources Loaded

776 ms

Page Rendered

179 ms

babyzip.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to babyzip.com homepage info - get ready to check Babyzip best content right away, or after learning these important things about babyzip.com

Visit babyzip.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Babyzip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 955 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

babyzip.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

babyzip.com

397 ms

main.05e11966e54a7ee94a37404daccb2c74.css

116 ms

app.ab29bfd164428d10f32bc34df1cad4ed.css

167 ms

polyfills_469970f8ffedace1b5b8.js

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Babyzip.com, 75% (3 requests) were made to Static.nc-img.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (397 ms) belongs to the original domain Babyzip.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

104.9 kB

After Optimization

74.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Babyzip.com main page is 104.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 59.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 44.9 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 21 B

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 59.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Babyzip.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Babyzip. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

babyzip.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

babyzip.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

babyzip.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Babyzip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Babyzip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Babyzip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: