3.5 sec in total
277 ms
3 sec
260 ms
Welcome to badlanguage.net homepage info - get ready to check Badlanguage best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about badlanguage.net
Articulate Marketing helps B2B technology companies differentiate with digital marketing, optimised websites, thought leadership and HubSpot services.
Visit badlanguage.netWe analyzed Badlanguage.net page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
badlanguage.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value2,390 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
277 ms
178 ms
529 ms
17 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Badlanguage.net, 32% (11 requests) were made to Articmarketing.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 21% (7 requests) were made to Articulatemarketing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Articulatemarketing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 447.8 kB (55%)
820.5 kB
372.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Badlanguage.net main page is 820.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 327.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Badlanguage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 217.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 197.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Badlanguage.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (26%)
27
20
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Badlanguage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
badlanguage.net
277 ms
www.badlanguage.net
178 ms
www.articulatemarketing.com
529 ms
autoptimize_1fe9aa71917162b96b0ec4b0056f44ee.css
17 ms
current.js
99 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
82 ms
e-201611.js
83 ms
autoptimize_b18be53f2acaadfd28c58720a2f5a3ec.js
83 ms
analytics.js
347 ms
8e998a72-612a-4e7b-854d-c5d6030ebf01.png
414 ms
articulate-intro.png
13 ms
1x1.trans.gif
16 ms
Cookie-w480-133x100.jpg
15 ms
15743483265_4ba49e7c52_k-w480-178x100.jpg
17 ms
13653012493_3a1c4521fc_z-133x100.jpg
17 ms
18be6c0c-2ce6-4ad5-a8fe-1f35ffa2b74a.png
456 ms
a89200ab-0def-45a1-bf28-881b4e55fd04.png
544 ms
451c56c5-0131-4f25-b233-2ddafe9eb873.png
518 ms
0fbea148-737e-41ad-8943-a84131fac8c2.png
512 ms
a1faa4bd-3f1e-471f-8a0d-403126bedf38.png
507 ms
Nexa_Regular-webfont.woff
694 ms
Nexa_XBold-webfont.woff
657 ms
icomoon-brewpixel.ttf
513 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
821 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
720 ms
289742.js
238 ms
admin-ajax.php
1551 ms
hp.svg
61 ms
g.gif
60 ms
collect
81 ms
collect
81 ms
linked-in.svg
20 ms
symantec.svg
22 ms
microsoft.svg
23 ms
badlanguage.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
badlanguage.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
badlanguage.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Badlanguage.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Badlanguage.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
badlanguage.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Badlanguage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: