11.7 sec in total
2.7 sec
8 sec
960 ms
Visit bathartrefinishing.com now to see the best up-to-date Bath Art Refinishing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bathartrefinishing.com
Visit bathartrefinishing.comWe analyzed Bathartrefinishing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
bathartrefinishing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
10/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
2702 ms
68 ms
138 ms
218 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Bathartrefinishing.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Bathartrefinishing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 844.5 kB (18%)
4.8 MB
4.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Bathartrefinishing.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 378.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bath Art Refinishing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 313.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bathartrefinishing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 313.1 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (69%)
75
23
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bath Art Refinishing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bathartrefinishing.com
2702 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
68 ms
ba-plus.min.css
138 ms
style.min.css
218 ms
styles.css
190 ms
style.css
170 ms
style.css
171 ms
style.css
171 ms
js_composer.min.css
264 ms
all.min.css
253 ms
xstore.min.css
230 ms
skeleton.min.css
256 ms
meta.min.css
254 ms
popup-added-to-cart.min.css
299 ms
single-product.min.css
300 ms
single-product-elements.min.css
301 ms
wpb.min.css
291 ms
breadcrumbs.min.css
289 ms
back-top.min.css
293 ms
contact-forms.min.css
317 ms
menu.min.css
340 ms
kirki-styles.css
345 ms
jquery.min.js
397 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
369 ms
js
71 ms
icon-boxes.min.css
360 ms
v4-shims.min.css
638 ms
all.min.css
643 ms
off-canvas.min.css
642 ms
mobile-menu.min.css
647 ms
toggles-by-arrow.min.css
648 ms
animate.min.css
650 ms
ba-plus.min.js
684 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
682 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
682 ms
index.js
684 ms
comment-reply.min.js
686 ms
imagesLoaded.js
687 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
659 ms
etheme-scripts.min.js
590 ms
swiper.min.js
621 ms
tabs.min.js
553 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
612 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
602 ms
mobileMenu.min.js
506 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
469 ms
back-top.min.js
462 ms
background.png
848 ms
banner-min.jpg
370 ms
bg1.png
538 ms
xstore-placeholder.png
363 ms
bg2.jpg
573 ms
1-2.jpg
536 ms
1-1.jpg
537 ms
2-2.jpg
570 ms
2-1.jpg
571 ms
3-2.jpg
571 ms
3-1.jpg
629 ms
4-2.jpg
656 ms
4-1.jpg
705 ms
5-2.jpg
665 ms
5-1.jpg
565 ms
xstore-placeholder-179x100.png
586 ms
footer-bg.jpg
742 ms
analytics.js
188 ms
GraphikRegular.otf
568 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
600 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
601 ms
GraphikBold.otf
677 ms
Gobold_Lowplus.ttf
674 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
676 ms
xstore-icons-light.ttf
674 ms
logo.png
1026 ms
GraphikMedium.otf
1017 ms
collect
18 ms
VjKlbFlYERY
139 ms
www-player.css
541 ms
www-embed-player.js
583 ms
base.js
616 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
581 ms
ad_status.js
140 ms
Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js
112 ms
embed.js
22 ms
id
35 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
43 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
43 ms
bathartrefinishing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bathartrefinishing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bathartrefinishing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bathartrefinishing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bathartrefinishing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bathartrefinishing.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bath Art Refinishing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: