2.1 sec in total
277 ms
1.6 sec
165 ms
Click here to check amazing Beautifulselection content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautifulselection.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit beautifulselection.comWe analyzed Beautifulselection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
beautifulselection.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value1,710 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.189
65/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
277 ms
217 ms
61 ms
46 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Beautifulselection.com, 5% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to D.adroll.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (470 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 745.4 kB (66%)
1.1 MB
378.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautifulselection.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 893.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beautifulselection needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 581.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 581.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautifulselection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (75%)
100
25
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautifulselection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautifulselection.com
277 ms
monetate.js
217 ms
application.css
61 ms
ng-modal.css
46 ms
angular.min.js
64 ms
ng-modal.js
45 ms
google_analytics.js
43 ms
google_oauth.js
44 ms
bold_chat.js
51 ms
eloqua.js
51 ms
hotjar.js
50 ms
adroll.js
51 ms
impactRadius.js
54 ms
in.js
66 ms
api.js
71 ms
api:client.js
77 ms
app.js
52 ms
cookies.js
51 ms
socialMedia.js
52 ms
countryDropdown.js
55 ms
monetate.js
55 ms
index.js
54 ms
lander.js
54 ms
seoPages.js
54 ms
sitePages.js
56 ms
search.js
56 ms
modal.js
59 ms
forms.js
64 ms
tldSelector.js
56 ms
setFixedTop.js
58 ms
searchBar.js
80 ms
currency.js
58 ms
trust.js
58 ms
conversion.js
54 ms
tdfs-inner.css
58 ms
tdfs-temp.css
58 ms
thankyou.css
58 ms
entry.js
14 ms
custom.js
12 ms
css
26 ms
fontawesome.min.css
9 ms
bd-icons.min.css
11 ms
ga.js
19 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
120 ms
userspace
284 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
115 ms
recaptcha__en.js
282 ms
all.js
375 ms
283 ms
logo-header-2x.png
104 ms
386892883-0
316 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
204 ms
292 ms
hotjar-10205.js
290 ms
elqCfg.min.js
162 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
145 ms
bg-select.png
145 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
145 ms
__utm.gif
95 ms
postmessageRelay
137 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
26 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
__utm.gif
76 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
28 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
72 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
74 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
74 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
69 ms
svrGP
220 ms
iframe
107 ms
framework
53 ms
collect
181 ms
91 ms
386892883-1
33 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
100 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
84 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
108 ms
__utm.gif
63 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
53 ms
71 ms
svrGP.aspx
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
xd_arbiter.php
237 ms
xd_arbiter.php
470 ms
iframerpc
27 ms
vms.js
119 ms
fallback
33 ms
roundtrip.js
8 ms
fallback__ltr.css
13 ms
payload
22 ms
css
60 ms
xd_arbiter.php
231 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
71 ms
logo_48.png
14 ms
refresh.png
60 ms
audio.png
76 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
132 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
148 ms
bc.pv
115 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
88 ms
65 ms
64 ms
out
31 ms
out
30 ms
out
29 ms
u.php
72 ms
adsct
124 ms
49 ms
pixel
69 ms
40 ms
21 ms
sync
23 ms
377928.gif
13 ms
sd
8 ms
in
14 ms
tap.php
23 ms
beautifulselection.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
beautifulselection.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
beautifulselection.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautifulselection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Beautifulselection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautifulselection.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beautifulselection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: