4.3 sec in total
778 ms
2.9 sec
597 ms
Welcome to beitrag-vergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Bei Tragvergleich best content right away, or after learning these important things about beitrag-vergleich.de
lll➤ Kostenloser anonymer Brutto-Netto-Rechner für 2022 ➥ Wie hoch sind welche Abzüge? ➥ Steuern und Sozialabgaben im Überblick
Visit beitrag-vergleich.deWe analyzed Beitrag-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 778 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
beitrag-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
778 ms
362 ms
256 ms
244 ms
249 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Beitrag-vergleich.de, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (869 ms) relates to the external source Anbieter-vergleichen.de.
Page size can be reduced by 399.3 kB (50%)
791.3 kB
392.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Beitrag-vergleich.de main page is 791.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 300.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bei Tragvergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 204.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beitrag-vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 147.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)
65
29
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bei Tragvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.anbieter-vergleichen.de
778 ms
wp-nav-menu-breadcrumbs-style.css
362 ms
style.css
256 ms
style.css
244 ms
skin2.css
249 ms
buttons.css
239 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
263 ms
superfish.css
356 ms
superfish-navbar.css
357 ms
superfish-vertical.css
358 ms
sharelinks.min.css
371 ms
jquery.js
601 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
468 ms
jquery.timepicker.js
477 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
468 ms
hoverIntent.js
476 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
478 ms
superfish.js
574 ms
supersubs.js
575 ms
jquery.bxSlider.min.js
592 ms
wellness.settings.js
590 ms
fa_style.css
598 ms
fa_style_widget.css
687 ms
comment-reply.min.js
732 ms
core.min.js
732 ms
widget.min.js
734 ms
accordion.min.js
735 ms
tabs.min.js
737 ms
datepicker.min.js
808 ms
logo.png
186 ms
festgeld-klein.png
208 ms
taschenrechner-klein.png
235 ms
girokonto-klein.png
236 ms
vl-klein.png
236 ms
bargeld-kreditkarte-klein.png
294 ms
stromkosten-klein.png
302 ms
handy-klein.png
304 ms
dsl-klein.png
317 ms
riesterrente-klein.png
330 ms
berufsunfaehigkeit-klein.png
330 ms
unfall-klein.png
398 ms
heizoeltropfen.jpg
408 ms
nr_1.gif
409 ms
nr_2.gif
420 ms
bnr.png
441 ms
ratgeber.png
442 ms
skin2-bg.jpg
687 ms
search.png
464 ms
social_rss.png
486 ms
background-shadow-left.png
508 ms
retina_dust.png
633 ms
banner.jpg
619 ms
hr-bg.jpg
584 ms
sidebar-bg.jpg
695 ms
widget-shadow.jpg
620 ms
bullet-arrow.png
703 ms
sidebar-bottom.jpg
734 ms
footer-top.jpg
837 ms
darkdenim3.png
813 ms
ejLRhBEorqjLDaF8s-xuTQ.ttf
35 ms
FZa_MODmDkR9DTu5jHSnSS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
55 ms
7M5kxD4eGxuhgFaIk95pBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
95 ms
zocial-regular-webfont.woff
869 ms
toTop.png
716 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
arrows-ffffff.png
704 ms
shadow.png
716 ms
collect
11 ms
mobile.css
118 ms
beitrag-vergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
beitrag-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
beitrag-vergleich.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beitrag-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beitrag-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beitrag-vergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bei Tragvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: