5.6 sec in total
265 ms
2.8 sec
2.6 sec
Welcome to bestcarecompare.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Care Compare best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about bestcarecompare.com
Find great hospitals, cosmetic treatments, care homes, home care, dentists, pharmacies, opticians and doctors surgeries near you and compare quality and prices.
Visit bestcarecompare.comWe analyzed Bestcarecompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 265 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bestcarecompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value2.6 s
87/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
265 ms
1036 ms
54 ms
152 ms
239 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Bestcarecompare.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestcarecompare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 934.6 kB (40%)
2.3 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Bestcarecompare.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 750.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Best Care Compare needs image optimization as it can save up to 750.6 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestcarecompare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (20%)
87
70
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Care Compare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bestcarecompare.com
265 ms
www.bestcarecompare.com
1036 ms
js
54 ms
gtm.js
152 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
239 ms
footer-distributed-with-address-and-phones.css
316 ms
linearicons.css
342 ms
simple-line-icons.css
345 ms
ionicons.css
348 ms
scoop-horizontal.min.css
351 ms
bcc_hosp5.css
384 ms
bootstrap3_5_min.css
392 ms
bootstrap.min.js
52 ms
testjs.js
269 ms
scoop.min.js
273 ms
demo-7.js
277 ms
bcc_home2.js
279 ms
select2.min.css
45 ms
select2.min.js
54 ms
logo1.png
96 ms
location_sm.jpg
127 ms
phone_sm.jpg
95 ms
home_bk32.webp
236 ms
logo1_ss.png
96 ms
homepage_wordmix.jpg
95 ms
fill_pic.jpg
195 ms
hc68.jpg
320 ms
home_bk9_s.jpg
241 ms
hc34.jpg
251 ms
hc84_s.jpg
196 ms
hc78_s.jpg
233 ms
hc76_s.jpg
281 ms
hc73_s.jpg
313 ms
hc77_s.jpg
316 ms
hc16_s.jpg
321 ms
hc43.jpg
411 ms
hc45.jpg
471 ms
hc104_s.jpg
391 ms
hc99_s.jpg
394 ms
hc33_s.jpg
397 ms
hc2_s.jpg
399 ms
hc9_s.jpg
470 ms
hc1_s.jpg
471 ms
hc12.jpg
482 ms
hc109.jpg
484 ms
hc118.jpg
496 ms
hc119_s.jpg
548 ms
hc120_s.jpg
565 ms
hc108_s.jpg
548 ms
hc121_s.jpg
561 ms
hc92_s.jpg
564 ms
hc122_s.jpg
573 ms
hc82.jpg
630 ms
hc53.jpg
631 ms
hc123.jpg
578 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
556 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
577 ms
ionicons.ttf
576 ms
footer.html
625 ms
hc124_s.jpg
584 ms
hc125_s.jpg
536 ms
hc126_s.jpg
539 ms
hc127_s.jpg
527 ms
hc128_s.jpg
530 ms
smoke7.jpg
566 ms
hc35.jpg
557 ms
sleep3.jpg
534 ms
smoke15_s.jpg
503 ms
hc37_s.jpg
508 ms
sleep8_s.jpg
541 ms
smoke2_s.jpg
566 ms
hc41_s.jpg
494 ms
sleep5_s.jpg
500 ms
pattern7.png
496 ms
bcc_hosp6.css
176 ms
widgets.js
104 ms
logo2_L.png
231 ms
fb1.jpg
236 ms
twitter1.jpg
235 ms
linked1.jpg
246 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf
9 ms
home_bk6_dt.jpg
80 ms
dentist.jpg
96 ms
privatehospital.jpg
82 ms
cosmetic.jpg
81 ms
doctor.jpg
83 ms
pharmacy_dt.jpg
85 ms
optician.jpg
157 ms
homecare.jpg
161 ms
maternity.jpg
162 ms
hospital.jpg
160 ms
mental_health.jpg
165 ms
home_bk43_s.jpg
190 ms
bestcarecompare.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bestcarecompare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bestcarecompare.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestcarecompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestcarecompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestcarecompare.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Care Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: