13.8 sec in total
2.4 sec
10.3 sec
1 sec
Welcome to bestpoolcleanerreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Pool Cleanerreview best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bestpoolcleanerreview.com
Looking for the best robotic pool cleaner? One of these 18 pool robots from Aquabot, Dophin, Hayward & Polaris will def. meet your needs.
Visit bestpoolcleanerreview.comWe analyzed Bestpoolcleanerreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
bestpoolcleanerreview.com performance score
2432 ms
282 ms
322 ms
320 ms
384 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Bestpoolcleanerreview.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestpoolcleanerreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 573.8 kB (42%)
1.4 MB
796.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Bestpoolcleanerreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 554.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Pool Cleanerreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 263.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 263.2 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 264.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestpoolcleanerreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 264.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (49%)
47
24
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Pool Cleanerreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bestpoolcleanerreview.com
2432 ms
style.css
282 ms
light.css
322 ms
default.min.css
320 ms
jquery.js
384 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
324 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.js
322 ms
hoverIntent.js
461 ms
superfish.js
460 ms
css
127 ms
adsbygoogle.js
179 ms
comment-reply.min.js
457 ms
wp-embed.min.js
468 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
167 ms
analytics.js
140 ms
collect
50 ms
light-header.png
627 ms
Banner.jpg
1215 ms
search.png
549 ms
Pool-Cleaner-Reviews.jpg
613 ms
Suction-Side-Cleaner.jpg
547 ms
Robotic-Pool-Cleaner.jpg
893 ms
The-Pool-Cleaner-150x150.jpg
859 ms
Hayward-Tiger-Shark-150x150.jpg
880 ms
Kreepy-Krauly-150x150.jpg
886 ms
Buyers-Guide.png
1911 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
472 ms
ca-pub-4538323849081132.js
423 ms
zrt_lookup.html
466 ms
show_ads_impl.js
963 ms
top.png
852 ms
kxVeirZ56XI
266 ms
www-embed-player-vfl-z2BtK.css
451 ms
www-embed-player.js
573 ms
base.js
1455 ms
ads
435 ms
osd.js
194 ms
ads
365 ms
ads
329 ms
m_js_controller.js
305 ms
abg.js
429 ms
favicon
277 ms
favicon
298 ms
favicon
331 ms
favicon
308 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
480 ms
favicon
268 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
151 ms
s
141 ms
x_button_blue2.png
134 ms
9aKOW9kHIBrJTB9ONj-e1oyTZuOGlgCE-J5p-KupNmo.js
202 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
182 ms
ad_status.js
193 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
207 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
249 ms
bestpoolcleanerreview.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestpoolcleanerreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestpoolcleanerreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestpoolcleanerreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Pool Cleanerreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: