1.8 sec in total
241 ms
1.3 sec
234 ms
Visit betterclix.com now to see the best up-to-date Betterclix content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betterclix.com
Visit betterclix.comWe analyzed Betterclix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 241 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
betterclix.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
241 ms
461 ms
83 ms
273 ms
338 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Betterclix.com, 20% (10 requests) were made to Google.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Secure.trust-guard.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (461 ms) belongs to the original domain Betterclix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 126.8 kB (34%)
374.4 kB
247.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Betterclix.com main page is 374.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 203.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Betterclix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 103.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betterclix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (41%)
44
26
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Betterclix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
betterclix.com
241 ms
www.betterclix.com
461 ms
style1.css
83 ms
273 ms
seal.js
338 ms
header1a.png
183 ms
logo3d.png
181 ms
head_img1.jpg
226 ms
challenge
37 ms
challenge
60 ms
252 ms
244 ms
body_bgd.gif
148 ms
header_bgd.jpg
212 ms
marker.jpg
170 ms
marker1.gif
170 ms
content_bgd.gif
180 ms
ourvision.png
222 ms
box1_title1.jpg
223 ms
box1_title2.jpg
236 ms
featuredservices.png
235 ms
box2_title1.jpg
246 ms
box2_title2.jpg
285 ms
advancedsolutions.png
328 ms
box3_title1.jpg
326 ms
box3_title2.jpg
326 ms
contactform.png
328 ms
box4_title1.jpg
327 ms
box4_title2.jpg
348 ms
box1.jpg
186 ms
marker2.jpg
124 ms
marker3.gif
140 ms
box2.jpg
201 ms
marker5.jpg
138 ms
marker4.gif
165 ms
box3.jpg
278 ms
marker6.jpg
220 ms
marker7.gif
219 ms
box4.jpg
235 ms
recaptcha.js
5 ms
fdNPhfiab-XXWFZC4cs1ZwRW1YVuobzzx0F9p6k9YN8.js
7 ms
61 ms
footer_bgd.jpg
225 ms
60 ms
refresh.gif
34 ms
audio.gif
12 ms
text.gif
12 ms
help.gif
13 ms
sprite.png
4 ms
reload
30 ms
image
16 ms
betterclix.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
betterclix.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
betterclix.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterclix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Betterclix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betterclix.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Betterclix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: