2.6 sec in total
320 ms
1.3 sec
979 ms
Click here to check amazing Betterpak content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about betterpak.com
Better Pak Container is a trusted partner for e-commerce packaging and janitorial supplies. We have been serving New York and New Jersey for three generations.
Visit betterpak.comWe analyzed Betterpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
betterpak.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
Value380 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.269
45/100
15%
Value5.2 s
75/100
10%
320 ms
81 ms
542 ms
8 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Betterpak.com, 50% (16 requests) were made to Cdn.sanity.io and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (979 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.sanity.io.
Page size can be reduced by 55.5 kB (6%)
985.0 kB
929.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Betterpak.com main page is 985.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 924.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Betterpak images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (25%)
28
21
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Betterpak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
betterpak.com
320 ms
js
81 ms
17445607230b8a785b3ebb252a9eaf3a042174d8-792x956.jpg
542 ms
email-decode.min.js
8 ms
state.js
151 ms
0cceb2a.js
47 ms
f4067a0.js
47 ms
e175750.js
210 ms
fba935e.js
57 ms
5fbb055.js
151 ms
b60af22b9720f5fc17e4c3d05061406bc3c49b78-390x313.jpg
366 ms
3b0304d44430ac8abc936e81cdf6d71671dd5b00-225x225.png
332 ms
4e7b842ffffaee59ecac95bfc843567a0b67ed4e-225x225.jpg
416 ms
d7a1677504938e3a65179df46c5750e425b7b4bf-196x196.png
346 ms
69b518b415e5555831e74fb59ca57930724acbf7-196x196.png
367 ms
5c5f151e04d4f4309395926e8e241f5ea24cce6d-336x336.png
662 ms
8fd9a5760078ab5d59e1aebeaa48c17fb247a8d1-262x193.png
626 ms
1ea5ac60e57372d266139182d22bea8633636eaf-225x225.png
628 ms
042747f7a6960d3fd8061d7d4a7de60aa7975244-49x54.svg
610 ms
669f7a96a8e4dbcf8035b03790630fb317872030-251x201.png
743 ms
c5e4522d119fe6c114a73622fac68c96a5e23798-224x225.png
807 ms
e5657d90098f6fba951311d0992498a50a9d8479-240x240.png
944 ms
7db3404e1084326b12c70cebe75ca58eda2d889f-177x177.png
979 ms
6a0e996d7a7d15dae86eb7ce688cd3227c0200ba-235x215.png
948 ms
3b0be9f0e9b617879c7d878c87886feae389e298-196x196.png
958 ms
9fab366.svg
150 ms
f6e968c.png
154 ms
6615b27.png
155 ms
1ba52cc.png
313 ms
apercu-medium.590d814.woff
130 ms
apercu-regular.b97694b.woff
25 ms
apercu-bold.c88a0b8.woff
19 ms
betterpak.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
betterpak.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
betterpak.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Betterpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betterpak.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Betterpak. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: