5.5 sec in total
57 ms
2 sec
3.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Bibledesignblog content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bibledesignblog.com
The physical form of the Good Book
Visit bibledesignblog.comWe analyzed Bibledesignblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bibledesignblog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value12.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value1,130 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
57 ms
18 ms
24 ms
17 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Bibledesignblog.com, 9% (12 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Bibledesignblog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 573.4 kB (10%)
5.8 MB
5.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Bibledesignblog.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 114.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bibledesignblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 259.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 259.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bibledesignblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 169.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (48%)
120
62
The browser has sent 120 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bibledesignblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bibledesignblog.com
57 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
18 ms
dashicons.min.css
24 ms
thickbox.css
17 ms
styles.css
21 ms
social_widget.css
23 ms
twitter-feed.css
22 ms
style.css
29 ms
style-mobile.css
25 ms
organic-shortcodes.css
36 ms
font-awesome.css
34 ms
pretty-photo.css
35 ms
css
40 ms
css
54 ms
jetpack.css
30 ms
jquery.js
39 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
38 ms
jquery.custom.js
39 ms
retina.js
37 ms
widgets.js
22 ms
plusone.js
175 ms
thickbox.js
32 ms
jquery.loadPosts.js
77 ms
jquery.form.min.js
37 ms
scripts.js
35 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
87 ms
gprofiles.js
87 ms
wpgroho.js
38 ms
superfish.js
37 ms
hoverIntent.js
35 ms
jquery.fitVids.js
44 ms
jquery.modal.min.js
76 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
44 ms
masonry.min.js
76 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
44 ms
core.min.js
77 ms
widget.min.js
75 ms
tabs.min.js
78 ms
accordion.min.js
76 ms
mouse.min.js
78 ms
resizable.min.js
77 ms
draggable.min.js
83 ms
e-201609.js
29 ms
button.min.js
81 ms
position.min.js
80 ms
dialog.min.js
78 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
76 ms
wp-embed.min.js
74 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
128 ms
background.png
126 ms
all.js
192 ms
search_icon.png
122 ms
copy-BDBLogo4.jpg
91 ms
TheJesusStory.jpg
227 ms
SchuylerCaxtonNLT.jpg
216 ms
CaxtonSelect2-1024x672.jpg
154 ms
CaxtonSelect1-1024x672.jpg
227 ms
CaxtonSelect14-1024x672.jpg
90 ms
CaxtonSelect13-1024x672.jpg
154 ms
CaxtonSelect16-1024x672.jpg
228 ms
CaxtonSelect12-1024x672.jpg
227 ms
CaxtonSelect4-1024x672.jpg
255 ms
CaxtonSelect7-1024x672.jpg
256 ms
CaxtonSelect6-1024x672.jpg
256 ms
CaxtonSelect9-1024x672.jpg
231 ms
CaxtonSelect15-1024x563.jpg
255 ms
CaxtonSelect3-1024x672.jpg
256 ms
CaxtonSelect8-1024x672.jpg
1060 ms
CaxtonSelect10-1024x672.jpg
1061 ms
CaxtonSelect5-1024x672.jpg
1058 ms
CaxtonSelect11-1024x672.jpg
1056 ms
E1-1024x587.jpg
1060 ms
e2-1024x587.jpg
1056 ms
e3-1024x587.jpg
1083 ms
e4-1024x587.jpg
1058 ms
e5-1024x587.jpg
1080 ms
e6-1024x587.jpg
1081 ms
e7-1024x587.jpg
1080 ms
e8-1024x587.jpg
1080 ms
e9-1024x587.jpg
1080 ms
e11-1024x587.jpg
1122 ms
e10-1024x587.jpg
1155 ms
e12-1024x587.jpg
1157 ms
e13-1024x587.jpg
1120 ms
facebook.png
1116 ms
twitter.png
1159 ms
wordpress.png
1192 ms
rss.png
1178 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
74 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
76 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
76 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf
77 ms
email.png
1114 ms
footer_logo.png
1110 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
60 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
913 ms
xd_arbiter.php
858 ms
xd_arbiter.php
1045 ms
hovercard.css
103 ms
services.css
183 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
94 ms
ping
186 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
51 ms
fastbutton
126 ms
fastbutton
151 ms
fastbutton
149 ms
fastbutton
146 ms
fastbutton
143 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
139 ms
g.gif
17 ms
postmessageRelay
158 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
41 ms
rs=AGLTcCMk3sj9NaceXOzrBC9voPfmiWfqLw
52 ms
like.php
110 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
45 ms
api.js
110 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
95 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
94 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
101 ms
like.php
124 ms
like.php
113 ms
like.php
152 ms
like.php
165 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
293 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
323 ms
jot.html
2 ms
bibledesignblog.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
bibledesignblog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bibledesignblog.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bibledesignblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bibledesignblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bibledesignblog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bibledesignblog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: