Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

304 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

291 ms

bitefight.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bitefight content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bitefight.in

Play online and browser games for free at Gameforge.com. Exciting role-playing games and challenging strategy games - create your free account now.

Visit bitefight.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Bitefight.in page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bitefight.in performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,950 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bitefight.in

304 ms

index

284 ms

_cache-6204cb34388c742d8f525bf9c1b2e4d6

53 ms

ba6259c29cf1159a510b37db064d8e.css

2763 ms

b24a43dc3d9da553b1ea65b9e0f26c.css

2608 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bitefight.in, 35% (30 requests) were made to Gf2.geo.gfsrv.net and 27% (23 requests) were made to Gf1.geo.gfsrv.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Gf1.geo.gfsrv.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 409.4 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Bitefight.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 48.3 kB

  • Original 61.6 kB
  • After minification 57.6 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bitefight images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 155.4 kB

  • Original 238.7 kB
  • After minification 217.1 kB
  • After compression 83.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.9 kB

  • Original 243.5 kB
  • After minification 206.9 kB
  • After compression 40.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bitefight.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (47%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

44

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bitefight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bitefight.in accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

bitefight.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bitefight.in SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    US

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bitefight.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is . Our system also found out that Bitefight.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bitefight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: