13.8 sec in total
1.7 sec
12 sec
131 ms
Click here to check amazing Bitemark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bitemark.com.au
Visit bitemark.com.auWe analyzed Bitemark.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 12.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
bitemark.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value560 ms
52/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
1673 ms
957 ms
25 ms
1977 ms
952 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Bitemark.com.au, 19% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bitemark.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 623.9 kB (81%)
769.5 kB
145.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Bitemark.com.au main page is 769.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 419.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 387 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bitemark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 242.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 242.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 373.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bitemark.com.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 373.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (74%)
19
5
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bitemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bitemark.com.au
1673 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
957 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
1977 ms
shortcodes.css
952 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
955 ms
magnific_popup.css
949 ms
jquery.js
1591 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2033 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
2031 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2066 ms
custom.js
2316 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
2065 ms
waypoints.min.js
2315 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
2981 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
2984 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2683 ms
bm-logo-fish-300w.png
648 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
5 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
7 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
16 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
14 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
14 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
616 ms
www.bitemark.com.au
4547 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.woff
324 ms
www.bitemark.com.au
687 ms
bitemark.com.au accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
bitemark.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bitemark.com.au SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bitemark.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bitemark.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bitemark.com.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bitemark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: