6.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.9 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Bits Of Yesterday Blogspot content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com
Visit bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.comWe analyzed Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.43
22/100
15%
Value4.5 s
83/100
10%
1144 ms
37 ms
85 ms
65 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com, 19% (17 requests) were made to Google.com and 14% (13 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 175.8 kB (14%)
1.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 965.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 664 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bits Of Yesterday Blogspot images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (41%)
88
52
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bits Of Yesterday Blogspot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com
1144 ms
3645911276-widget_css_bundle.css
37 ms
authorization.css
85 ms
plusone.js
65 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
36 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
47 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
75 ms
google_top_exp.js
76 ms
Family%2B2013-002.jpg
318 ms
SDC14188.JPG
428 ms
SDC14189.JPG
373 ms
SDC14193.JPG
315 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
149 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
142 ms
friendconnect.js
67 ms
SDC14195.JPG
293 ms
SDC14178.JPG
459 ms
SDC14142.JPG
490 ms
SDC14143.JPG
444 ms
SDC14145.JPG
502 ms
SDC14136.JPG
545 ms
IMG_4888.jpg
315 ms
logo-16.png
46 ms
SDC14192.JPG
587 ms
SDC14179.JPG
563 ms
SDC14180.JPG
630 ms
SDC14170.JPG
578 ms
SDC14131.JPG
586 ms
SDC14133.JPG
552 ms
SDC14191.JPG
554 ms
SDC14199.JPG
554 ms
SDC14194.JPG
551 ms
SDC14197.JPG
552 ms
SDC14198.JPG
720 ms
SDC14177.JPG
550 ms
SDC14171.JPG
719 ms
SDC14172.JPG
713 ms
SDC14174.JPG
721 ms
SDC14137.JPG
740 ms
SDC14196.JPG
453 ms
SDC14182.JPG
457 ms
SDC14183.JPG
452 ms
SDC14173.JPG
496 ms
SDC14141.JPG
552 ms
navbar.g
123 ms
blank.html
93 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
31 ms
ifr
265 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_3
12 ms
icons_orange.png
24 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
40 ms
arrows-blue.png
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
9 ms
fastbutton
72 ms
postmessageRelay
45 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
14 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
16 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
30 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
22 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
37 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
ifr
36 ms
google.blog.js
32 ms
gadgets-ltr.css
56 ms
mod_gadget_common__en_US.js
10 ms
mod_gadget_members__en_US.js
48 ms
trash.gif
57 ms
plus.gif
59 ms
smallEnvelope.jpg
58 ms
fc-edit.png
59 ms
do-not-enter.gif
60 ms
unblock.gif
60 ms
rpc
70 ms
rpc
109 ms
rpc
118 ms
rpc
127 ms
dimage
58 ms
DSC03566.JPG
52 ms
uvMZU6D0cwT5s2JgCeGrMeJ8Yhx76Vo4uar3S_HuHZ2Eefhk8kkP-ONmDRqtZIPEjcOf5g5oCGN1XmQJJl4JYdSSvhQbcxksoSkOQO_y3hg
227 ms
_WXRXcPOpur5s2JgCeGrMeJ8Yhx76Vo4PAc3FsVANbhfHV06z7Uvw1BwcZMaFWk2ywkeyDv68rvH86t25q_KfdSSvhQbcxksoSkOQO_y3hg
241 ms
NoPictureDark32.jpg
36 ms
dimage
37 ms
dimage
37 ms
gfc_button_v2.gif
37 ms
306752634-lightbox_bundle.css
11 ms
favicon.ico
93 ms
favicon.ico
92 ms
favicon.ico
149 ms
favicon.ico
129 ms
297602417-lbx.js
16 ms
bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bits-of-yesterday.blogspot.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bits Of Yesterday Blogspot. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: