Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

bluebird.com

No Monthly Fees | Convenient Cash Reloads​ | Bluebird

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

137 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

543 ms

bluebird.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bluebird.com now to see the best up-to-date Bluebird content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bluebird.com

Loaded with Benefits. No Monthly Fees. Explore your online banking options with the Bluebird® AMEX® Prepaid Debit Card or Bluebird® Visa® Debit Card.

Visit bluebird.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bluebird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bluebird.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,690 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bluebird.com

137 ms

blue-bird.css

12 ms

styles.css

42 ms

mbox.js

53 ms

redirect.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Bluebird.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (415 ms) relates to the external source Youtube.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (47%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Bluebird.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 990.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 86.2 kB

  • Original 104.4 kB
  • After minification 97.1 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 990.7 kB
  • After minification 978.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bluebird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 619.0 kB

  • Original 837.8 kB
  • After minification 657.8 kB
  • After compression 218.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 619.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 418.9 kB

  • Original 492.1 kB
  • After minification 451.3 kB
  • After compression 73.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bluebird.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 418.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (32%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bluebird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bluebird.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

bluebird.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

bluebird.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluebird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bluebird.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bluebird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: