Tools & Wizards About Us
bodyart.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

bodyart.in

Best Gym in Mumbai | Fitness Center in Marine Drive, Hughes Road, Mumbai - Body Art

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

373 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

bodyart.in screenshot

About Website

Visit bodyart.in now to see the best up-to-date Body Art content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bodyart.in

Looking for the best fitness center near your location in Mumbai. Body Art best fitness gym in Mumbai located in Andheri West, Marine Drive, Huges Road and also now in Thane. Have highly trained & qua...

Visit bodyart.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Bodyart.in page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bodyart.in performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bodyart.in

373 ms

bodyart.in

753 ms

js

71 ms

js

109 ms

bootstrap.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyart.in, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Bodyart.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bodyart.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 29.5 kB

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Body Art images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 72.3 kB
  • After minification 72.3 kB
  • After compression 53.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 91.2 kB
  • After minification 91.2 kB
  • After compression 63.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyart.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (66%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Body Art. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bodyart.in

bodyart.in

373 ms

bodyart.in

bodyart.in

753 ms

js

js

71 ms

js

js

109 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

42 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

57 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

navigation-menu.css

navigation-menu.css

194 ms

lib.css

lib.css

613 ms

shortcode.css

shortcode.css

575 ms

style.css

style.css

570 ms

grt-youtube-popup.css

grt-youtube-popup.css

566 ms

grt-youtube-popup.js

grt-youtube-popup.js

570 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1045 ms

jquery.magnify.css

jquery.magnify.css

571 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

752 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

951 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

760 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

760 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

759 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

801 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

938 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

950 ms

sitemapstyler.css

sitemapstyler.css

944 ms

sitemapstyler.js

sitemapstyler.js

948 ms

functions.js

functions.js

987 ms

jquery.quovolver.js

jquery.quovolver.js

1123 ms

jquery.magnify.js

jquery.magnify.js

1138 ms

BodyArt-Logo.png

BodyArt-Logo.png

1139 ms

BodyArt-Small.png

BodyArt-Small.png

1140 ms

slider-2.jpg

slider-2.jpg

1700 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

1730 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

2411 ms

slider-4.jpg

slider-4.jpg

1883 ms

Aerobic.png

Aerobic.png

1329 ms

Aerobic2.png

Aerobic2.png

1329 ms

Aerobic3.png

Aerobic3.png

1528 ms

Aerobic4.png

Aerobic4.png

1527 ms

montserrat-light.woff

montserrat-light.woff

1304 ms

search-white.png

search-white.png

612 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

574 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

782 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

11 ms

Accessibility Review

bodyart.in accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bodyart.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bodyart.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyart.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bodyart.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bodyart.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Body Art. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: