Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

bodyfattest.com

Body Fat Test

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

186 ms

Resources Loaded

763 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

bodyfattest.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bodyfattest.com homepage info - get ready to check Body Fat Test best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bodyfattest.com

We use the gold-standard in body fat testing. With over 16 locations and growing, we've done more tests than any other company world-wide!

Visit bodyfattest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bodyfattest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 937 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bodyfattest.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bodyfattest.com

186 ms

www.bodyfattest.com

191 ms

site_global.css

81 ms

index.css

155 ms

XyVKItxW7MIxVj8jPsxUtYifw2jylulLKChkIY8OjWSfeGXffOAuv3IPH2wo526UF28LjDyqjhIDFhs8wDsqjRba5AjkZ2885QFcwhwojAbaZcJ-03I7Oc4zZY8cjWsXZWFXOcFzdPUKdhsoZcBXiemDifoRdhXC-AoKScNaShmkZAsTie80ZkoyZeNKZPoRdhXC-AoKScNaShmkZAsTie80ZkoliWF8SY48ScmCZABDZPoRdhXCiaiaOc4zZY8cjWsXZWFXOcFzdPUaiaS0-AoKScNaShmkZAsTie80ZkoyZeNKZPoRdhXCiaiaOc80j14ziaF8Scmq-WsTdcS0dWmDZWgkZW48demySh90jhNlJ6mTdcikjPGHfJOVMsMMeMJ6MqGIQWmDZZMgxxpnk39.js

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Bodyfattest.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (232 ms) belongs to the original domain Bodyfattest.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (75%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

758.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Bodyfattest.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 40.3 kB

  • Original 52.3 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.8 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 81.3 kB
  • After minification 78.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Body Fat Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB
  • After compression 654.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 85.5 kB

  • Original 100.0 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bodyfattest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Body Fat Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bodyfattest.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

bodyfattest.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bodyfattest.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bodyfattest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bodyfattest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Body Fat Test. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: