4.3 sec in total
300 ms
3.9 sec
95 ms
Welcome to bpp.com homepage info - get ready to check Bpp best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about bpp.com
Prepare for exams or study for qualifications with BPP.com specialists in learning media, university courses & professional studies for over 35 years
Visit bpp.comWe analyzed Bpp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
bpp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.1 s
0/100
10%
Value17.6 s
0/100
25%
Value39.9 s
0/100
10%
Value38,550 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value59.4 s
0/100
10%
300 ms
906 ms
614 ms
359 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Bpp.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to S3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bpp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (49%)
2.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Bpp.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bpp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 653.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 653.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 647.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bpp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 647.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (76%)
63
15
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bpp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bpp.com
300 ms
www.bpp.com
906 ms
aui.css
614 ms
main.css
359 ms
main.css
186 ms
main.css
189 ms
main.css
190 ms
main.css
275 ms
main.css
279 ms
main.css
282 ms
main.css
281 ms
main.css
365 ms
lhn.css
374 ms
main.css
377 ms
barebone.jsp
1496 ms
main.js
549 ms
navigation.js
466 ms
lhn.js
471 ms
splitCarousel.js
544 ms
main.css
652 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
844 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
639 ms
css
32 ms
CAP-UNI.css
509 ms
jquery.min.js
73 ms
homepage_responsive_script.js
370 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
557 ms
main.js
527 ms
main.js
554 ms
main.js
558 ms
main.js
568 ms
upload.js
620 ms
main.js
644 ms
main.js
649 ms
main.js
662 ms
main.js
710 ms
gtm.js
46 ms
ubertags.js
15 ms
WEB-LOGO-UNI.png
96 ms
WEB-LOGO-PE.png
124 ms
HAMBURGER.png
189 ms
homepage-background-1.jpg
836 ms
homepage-background-2.jpg
995 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
63 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
62 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
65 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
66 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
66 ms
tag.js
50 ms
146 ms
activityi;src=4085209;type=count370;cat=001ho045;ord=1;num=1124284546822.3096
41 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
ga.js
44 ms
nas.v1.min.js
191 ms
UT-774034884
29 ms
conversion.js
24 ms
28 ms
ECMImage
179 ms
ECMImage
100 ms
52 ms
33 ms
linkid.js
27 ms
ec.js
35 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
collect
68 ms
collect
20 ms
58 ms
237 ms
track
91 ms
131 ms
available_languages.jsp
153 ms
853 ms
bpp.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
bpp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bpp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bpp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bpp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bpp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bpp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: