Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

998 ms in total

First Response

219 ms

Resources Loaded

608 ms

Page Rendered

171 ms

briefeditor.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to briefeditor.com homepage info - get ready to check Brief Editor best content right away, or after learning these important things about briefeditor.com

Brief text editor

Visit briefeditor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Briefeditor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 219 ms and then it took 779 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

briefeditor.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

briefeditor.com

219 ms

style.css

131 ms

index.htm_cmp_arctic000_hbtn_p.gif

145 ms

download.htm_cmp_arctic000_hbtn.gif

153 ms

releases.htm_cmp_arctic000_hbtn.gif

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Briefeditor.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) belongs to the original domain Briefeditor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 22.2 kB (24%)

Content Size

93.8 kB

After Optimization

71.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Briefeditor.com main page is 93.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 88.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 594 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 88.3 kB
  • After minification 70.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Brief Editor needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 365 B

  • Original 562 B
  • After minification 347 B
  • After compression 197 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Briefeditor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 365 B or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brief Editor. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

briefeditor.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

briefeditor.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

briefeditor.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Briefeditor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Briefeditor.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Brief Editor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: