3.2 sec in total
129 ms
2.6 sec
461 ms
Click here to check amazing Brillect content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brillect.com
At Brillect, we offer finance, accounting and project management talent solutions that help you achieve more. Connect with us to learn how we can help.
Visit brillect.comWe analyzed Brillect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
brillect.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value2,430 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
129 ms
29 ms
28 ms
145 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Brillect.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (681 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.3 kB (16%)
747.5 kB
629.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Brillect.com main page is 747.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 387.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 333 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brillect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (81%)
78
15
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brillect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.brillect.com
129 ms
team.min.css
29 ms
style.css
28 ms
bootstrap.min.css
145 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
39 ms
frontend.min.css
134 ms
swiper.min.css
94 ms
post-3514.css
41 ms
frontend.min.css
154 ms
global.css
44 ms
post-3363.css
43 ms
chart.min.css
50 ms
circles.min.css
51 ms
fancy-mockup.min.css
61 ms
levels.min.css
59 ms
map.min.css
73 ms
marquee.min.css
70 ms
carousel.min.css
77 ms
story.min.css
81 ms
video.min.css
87 ms
flickity.min.css
90 ms
style.min.css
96 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
176 ms
pix-essentials-style-2.css
102 ms
jquery.min.js
126 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
124 ms
js
70 ms
css
49 ms
email-decode.min.js
122 ms
post-13405.css
129 ms
pixfort-likes.css
336 ms
odometer-theme-default.css
130 ms
base.min.css
334 ms
cf7.min.css
130 ms
global-dividers.min.js
131 ms
index.js
150 ms
index.js
150 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
151 ms
api.js
44 ms
team.min.js
151 ms
popper.min.js
151 ms
bootstrap.min.js
140 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
138 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
138 ms
core.min.js
133 ms
essentials.min.js
134 ms
index.bundle.js
202 ms
odometer.min.js
299 ms
pixfort-likes.js
291 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
291 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
280 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
279 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
274 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
272 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
268 ms
hooks.min.js
265 ms
i18n.min.js
265 ms
frontend.min.js
253 ms
waypoints.min.js
231 ms
frontend.min.js
230 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
221 ms
insight.min.js
241 ms
b9629920f39586e1f2e456d7948dca5a
164 ms
logo-final-sticky.png
138 ms
Website-Featured-Image-800-%C3%97-800-px-7.jpg
503 ms
Website-Featured-Image-800-%C3%97-800-px-2.jpg
506 ms
Blog-Header-29-622x400.jpg
502 ms
Blog-Header-27-622x400.jpg
137 ms
Blog-Header-2-622x400.jpg
196 ms
Blog-Header-622x400.jpg
198 ms
Blog-Header-25-622x400.jpg
196 ms
image-promo-box-460x460.jpg
501 ms
logo-final.png
199 ms
js
377 ms
analytics.js
371 ms
pixicon.ttf
373 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
372 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
511 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
681 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
681 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
681 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
622 ms
app.js
610 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
593 ms
recaptcha__en.js
302 ms
collect
220 ms
brillect.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
brillect.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
brillect.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brillect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brillect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brillect.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brillect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: