Tools & Wizards About Us
brite.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

brite.com

Technology Solutions by Brite: Managed IT, Cybersecurity, & More

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

998 ms

Page Rendered

526 ms

brite.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Brite content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brite.com

Brite is your leading technology solutions partner, proactively protecting organizations through innovative managed IT & security services.

Visit brite.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Brite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

brite.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.277

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

brite.com

40 ms

brite.com

109 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

18 ms

7d4f4.css

44 ms

css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Brite.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) relates to the external source Ws.zoominfo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 206.6 kB (38%)

Content Size

547.5 kB

After Optimization

340.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Brite.com main page is 547.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 231.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 198.1 kB

  • Original 231.0 kB
  • After minification 231.0 kB
  • After compression 32.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 468 B

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 156.8 kB
  • After minification 156.8 kB
  • After compression 149.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 724 B

  • Original 152.2 kB
  • After minification 152.2 kB
  • After compression 151.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brite.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (65%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

brite.com

brite.com

40 ms

brite.com

brite.com

109 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

18 ms

7d4f4.css

7d4f4.css

44 ms

css

css

69 ms

a5ff7.css

a5ff7.css

32 ms

2ad6d.css

2ad6d.css

51 ms

825e1.css

825e1.css

92 ms

818c0.js

818c0.js

72 ms

js

js

74 ms

d0da4.css

d0da4.css

63 ms

f1320.js

f1320.js

75 ms

b721b.js

b721b.js

63 ms

24262610.js

24262610.js

339 ms

57fad.js

57fad.js

60 ms

16538.js

16538.js

68 ms

22590.js

22590.js

69 ms

1615d.js

1615d.js

69 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

206 ms

1rp3PBBd0sUps5CI3Cqw

1rp3PBBd0sUps5CI3Cqw

362 ms

bigstock-Middle-aged-white-male-creativ-298977391-copy.webp

bigstock-Middle-aged-white-male-creativ-298977391-copy.webp

177 ms

font

font

262 ms

js

js

188 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

183 ms

wARDj0u

wARDj0u

33 ms

astra.woff

astra.woff

179 ms

font

font

118 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

180 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

179 ms

bigstock-Middle-aged-white-male-creativ-298977391-copy.webp

bigstock-Middle-aged-white-male-creativ-298977391-copy.webp

149 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

204 ms

hotjar-3276068.js

hotjar-3276068.js

194 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

221 ms

24262610.js

24262610.js

231 ms

banner.js

banner.js

234 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

207 ms

fb.js

fb.js

210 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

cropped-white-139x58.png

cropped-white-139x58.png

44 ms

Incbadge-2021-e1686939886229.webp

Incbadge-2021-e1686939886229.webp

8 ms

Top-100-logo-2022--e1686940576751.webp

Top-100-logo-2022--e1686940576751.webp

18 ms

TopWorkPlace-2023-copy-e1686940932398.webp

TopWorkPlace-2023-copy-e1686940932398.webp

7 ms

2022_CRN-MSP-500-2-copy-e1686940966327.webp

2022_CRN-MSP-500-2-copy-e1686940966327.webp

8 ms

Brite-Logo-01-1-300x127.png

Brite-Logo-01-1-300x127.png

19 ms

modules.478d49d6cc21ec95d184.js

modules.478d49d6cc21ec95d184.js

30 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

63 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

33 ms

Accessibility Review

brite.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

brite.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

brite.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

brite.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: