4.2 sec in total
184 ms
3.3 sec
725 ms
Visit bugfinders.net now to see the best up-to-date Bugfinders content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bugfinders.net
Digivante is raising the bar for digital quality. We blend testers and tech for a solution you can stake your digital product’s future on.
Visit bugfinders.netWe analyzed Bugfinders.net page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
bugfinders.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value1,930 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
184 ms
1822 ms
1210 ms
41 ms
1093 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Bugfinders.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Digivante.com.
Page size can be reduced by 425.2 kB (11%)
3.8 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Bugfinders.net main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 409.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 409.7 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bugfinders images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 900 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bugfinders.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (45%)
49
27
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bugfinders. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bugfinders.com
184 ms
www.digivante.com
1822 ms
gtm.js
1210 ms
99d6349292e8f9cb3e326d7c9b34a7a9.min.css
41 ms
digivante-white-logo2.svg
1093 ms
jquery.min.js
81 ms
wp-embed.min.js
79 ms
1c859b3ab88d410db2f20e108e4f20b6.min.js
142 ms
d-abstract-1-blue.png
137 ms
white-svg.svg
138 ms
home-page-team.jpg
387 ms
home-page-user.jpg
389 ms
abstract-shape-d.png
141 ms
bluestrip.png
201 ms
orangestrip.png
202 ms
specsavers250.jpg
390 ms
tyreclick250.jpg
505 ms
nspcc-250.jpg
412 ms
digi-transform-team500.jpg
266 ms
hero-software-engineering.jpg
507 ms
digi-product-500.jpg
392 ms
qa-team-500.jpg
398 ms
ipad-gartner.jpg
716 ms
digital-product-team1800x1000.jpg
635 ms
Mobile-testing-blog-hero-page-image-guest-blog-v2.jpg
408 ms
blue-trapezium-rev.png
450 ms
awb-icons.woff
309 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
551 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
349 ms
analytics.js
151 ms
conversion_async.js
186 ms
loader.js
146 ms
insight.min.js
145 ms
1995448.js
209 ms
8hhn6tt016
182 ms
tracker.js
467 ms
62cd2f8a425c10008f134a16
194 ms
js
75 ms
call-tracking_7.js
17 ms
linkid.js
11 ms
collect
15 ms
collect
53 ms
136 ms
clarity.js
52 ms
wcm
54 ms
collectedforms.js
69 ms
1995448.js
114 ms
conversations-embed.js
76 ms
1995448.js
221 ms
fb.js
58 ms
ga-audiences
41 ms
18 ms
f0aee47a-9e9b-45bb-b668-1071f34cd5e4
119 ms
409 ms
34 ms
bugfinders.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bugfinders.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bugfinders.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bugfinders.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bugfinders.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bugfinders.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bugfinders. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: