Tools & Wizards About Us
buzzingradio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

buzzingradio.com

buzzingradio.com

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

717 ms

buzzingradio.com screenshot

About Website

Visit buzzingradio.com now to see the best up-to-date Buzzingradio content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about buzzingradio.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit buzzingradio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Buzzingradio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

buzzingradio.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

buzzingradio.com

1666 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

360 ms

style.min.css

384 ms

font-awesome.min.css

408 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

348 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Buzzingradio.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Buzzingradio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 451.1 kB (81%)

Content Size

557.0 kB

After Optimization

105.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Buzzingradio.com main page is 557.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 384.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 44.6 kB
  • After minification 44.6 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

  • Original 127.8 kB
  • After minification 127.4 kB
  • After compression 36.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 324.5 kB

  • Original 384.6 kB
  • After minification 382.9 kB
  • After compression 60.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buzzingradio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 324.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (59%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buzzingradio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

buzzingradio.com

buzzingradio.com

1666 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

360 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

384 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

408 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

348 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

377 ms

main-style.css

main-style.css

397 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

549 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

717 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

747 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

677 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1065 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1066 ms

main-scripts.js

main-scripts.js

1066 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1067 ms

e-202045.js

e-202045.js

31 ms

Buzzing_Radio_350_x_7001.png

Buzzing_Radio_350_x_7001.png

362 ms

1817540.png

1817540.png

405 ms

1268869.png

1268869.png

336 ms

1535306.png

1535306.png

368 ms

1278141.png

1278141.png

466 ms

1624161.png

1624161.png

571 ms

1587101.png

1587101.png

722 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

531 ms

SEO Factors

buzzingradio.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buzzingradio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buzzingradio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

buzzingradio.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buzzingradio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: