2.2 sec in total
318 ms
1.8 sec
169 ms
Click here to check amazing Byte Stor content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bytestor.in
Storage, Backup, DR, SAN, Cloud computing, Migration, IT Support, Consultancy Services
Visit bytestor.inWe analyzed Bytestor.in page load time and found that the first response time was 318 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
bytestor.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
318 ms
497 ms
73 ms
76 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Bytestor.in, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Bytestor.in.
Page size can be reduced by 805.9 kB (57%)
1.4 MB
603.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Bytestor.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 706.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Byte Stor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 531.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 531.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 224.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bytestor.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 224.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (81%)
77
15
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Byte Stor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bytestor.in
318 ms
www.bytestor.in
497 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
73 ms
styles.css
76 ms
jquery-ui.css
31 ms
front.css
88 ms
slider-pro.css
131 ms
owl.carousel.css
91 ms
owl.theme.css
100 ms
wen-logo-slider-public.css
115 ms
css
30 ms
css
38 ms
bootstrap.css
220 ms
font-awesome.min.css
172 ms
pixeden-icons.css
132 ms
style.css
344 ms
responsive.css
156 ms
jquery.js
296 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
175 ms
scripts-general.js
200 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
257 ms
webfont.js
27 ms
jquery.form.min.js
244 ms
scripts.js
230 ms
core.min.js
238 ms
widget.min.js
275 ms
accordion.min.js
277 ms
position.min.js
285 ms
menu.min.js
288 ms
autocomplete.min.js
322 ms
button.min.js
322 ms
datepicker.min.js
320 ms
mouse.min.js
375 ms
resizable.min.js
380 ms
draggable.min.js
376 ms
dialog.min.js
378 ms
droppable.min.js
379 ms
progressbar.min.js
376 ms
selectable.min.js
406 ms
slider.min.js
410 ms
spinner.min.js
438 ms
sortable.min.js
439 ms
tabs.min.js
399 ms
tooltip.min.js
396 ms
effect.min.js
383 ms
effect-blind.min.js
386 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
380 ms
effect-clip.min.js
374 ms
effect-drop.min.js
360 ms
effect-explode.min.js
358 ms
effect-fade.min.js
341 ms
effect-fold.min.js
325 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
346 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
322 ms
effect-size.min.js
307 ms
effect-scale.min.js
285 ms
effect-shake.min.js
279 ms
effect-slide.min.js
290 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
304 ms
jquery.sliderPro.js
444 ms
wen-logo-slider-public.js
282 ms
bootstrap.min.js
325 ms
jquery.knob.js
271 ms
smoothscroll.js
291 ms
scrollReveal.js
268 ms
zerif.js
272 ms
loading.gif
244 ms
logp.jpg
305 ms
map25-redish.png
258 ms
envelope4-green.png
255 ms
telephone65-blue.png
269 ms
people-traininganddevelopment1-e1449919550425.png
310 ms
Econ-Consulting-Icon-e1449919749231.png
291 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
27 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
27 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
28 ms
it-service_icon-e1449919983832.png
296 ms
it-solu-e1453889727588.png
284 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
376 ms
openhand.cur
75 ms
Techpartner1234.jpg
151 ms
Trainingsd1.jpg
92 ms
Consultantser1.jpg
114 ms
bytestor.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bytestor.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bytestor.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytestor.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bytestor.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bytestor.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Byte Stor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: