Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

staging.beautytap.com

Beautytap: Korean Beauty, Makeup, Skincare, Editorial & Community

Page Load Speed

14.7 sec in total

First Response

557 ms

Resources Loaded

13.5 sec

Page Rendered

576 ms

staging.beautytap.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to staging.beautytap.com homepage info - get ready to check Staging Beautytap best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about staging.beautytap.com

Beautytap is THE destination for Korean beauty: fun editorial articles, a vibrant and engaged community, and a shop with over 6,500 K-beauty products.

Visit staging.beautytap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Staging.beautytap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 557 ms and then it took 14.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staging.beautytap.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

staging.beautytap.com

557 ms

font-awesome.min.css

51 ms

dashicons.min.css

273 ms

thickbox.css

295 ms

style.min.css

292 ms

Our browser made a total of 184 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Staging.beautytap.com, 53% (97 requests) were made to D2609vz8zlfpyt.cloudfront.net and 9% (16 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.1 sec) relates to the external source D2609vz8zlfpyt.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 547.2 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Staging.beautytap.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 171.1 kB

  • Original 213.6 kB
  • After minification 213.5 kB
  • After compression 42.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Staging Beautytap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 35.8 kB

  • Original 220.9 kB
  • After minification 220.4 kB
  • After compression 185.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 315.8 kB

  • Original 612.5 kB
  • After minification 611.2 kB
  • After compression 296.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staging.beautytap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.8 kB or 52% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 105 (66%)

Requests Now

160

After Optimization

55

The browser has sent 160 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staging Beautytap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

staging.beautytap.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staging.beautytap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staging.beautytap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Staging Beautytap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: