2.3 sec in total
796 ms
1.3 sec
229 ms
Visit standardsproposals.bsigroup.com now to see the best up-to-date Standard Sproposals BSI Group content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about standardsproposals.bsigroup.com
Bringing together experts to define solutions that advance your sector. Develop industry standards, supported by our team and global industry leaders.
Visit standardsproposals.bsigroup.comWe analyzed Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 796 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
standardsproposals.bsigroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.267
46/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
796 ms
413 ms
419 ms
173 ms
91 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (796 ms) belongs to the original domain Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 62.6 kB (68%)
92.3 kB
29.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com main page is 92.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 41.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.0 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 527 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 34.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)
20
10
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Standard Sproposals BSI Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
standardsproposals.bsigroup.com
796 ms
Site.css
413 ms
BSI.css
419 ms
home.js
173 ms
BSINSLogo.gif
91 ms
primarynav_bg_bottom.gif
91 ms
primarynav_bg.gif
90 ms
primarynav_bg_leftbottom.gif
89 ms
primarynav_separator.gif
168 ms
secondarynav_arrow_solid.gif
169 ms
dotted_bg.gif
177 ms
landing_overview_bg.gif
173 ms
Group_About-BSI_400x149.gif
262 ms
largelinkarrow.gif
177 ms
smalllinkarrow.gif
252 ms
print_icon.gif
255 ms
infobox_bg_top.gif
262 ms
dotted_bg_withgradient.gif
262 ms
infobox_bg_bottom.gif
270 ms
ga.js
9 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
standardsproposals.bsigroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
standardsproposals.bsigroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
standardsproposals.bsigroup.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Standardsproposals.bsigroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
standardsproposals.bsigroup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Standard Sproposals BSI Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: