Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 63% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

test.beautybag.it

beautybag.it

Page Load Speed

964 ms in total

First Response

327 ms

Resources Loaded

516 ms

Page Rendered

121 ms

test.beautybag.it screenshot

About Website

Visit test.beautybag.it now to see the best up-to-date Test Beautybag content for Italy and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about test.beautybag.it

This domain may be for sale!

Visit test.beautybag.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.beautybag.it page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 637 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.beautybag.it performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.267

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.beautybag.it

327 ms

cloudflare.min.js

13 ms

blank.gif

179 ms

bag2

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Test.beautybag.it, 25% (1 request) were made to Ajax.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (327 ms) belongs to the original domain Test.beautybag.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 kB (32%)

Content Size

3.9 kB

After Optimization

2.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Test.beautybag.it main page is 3.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 48% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 94 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test Beautybag. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

test.beautybag.it accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

test.beautybag.it best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

test.beautybag.it SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.beautybag.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Test.beautybag.it main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test Beautybag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: