948 ms in total
80 ms
741 ms
127 ms
Click here to check amazing Tracker Bomgar content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tracker.bomgar.com
Login to manage your Bomgar™ remote support incidents and search the Bomgar™ knowledgebase.
Visit tracker.bomgar.comWe analyzed Tracker.bomgar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 868 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
tracker.bomgar.com performance score
80 ms
152 ms
20 ms
31 ms
80 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tracker.bomgar.com, 89% (76 requests) were made to Help.bomgar.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (237 ms) relates to the external source Help.bomgar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (77%)
1.9 MB
427.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Tracker.bomgar.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 608 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tracker Bomgar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 940.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 940.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 496.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tracker.bomgar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 496.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (83%)
81
14
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tracker Bomgar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tracker.bomgar.com
80 ms
152 ms
DXR.axd
20 ms
DXR.axd
31 ms
sprite.css
80 ms
styles.css
80 ms
start_session.js
170 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
104 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
79 ms
jquery.validate-1.13.1.min.js
80 ms
jquery.truncate.js
49 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
79 ms
sessions.js
101 ms
moment.js
131 ms
moment-timezone-with-data-2010-2020.js
101 ms
string.min.js
103 ms
tracking.js
99 ms
google-analytics.js
208 ms
outdatedbrowser.min.css
116 ms
ASPxCommon.css
115 ms
ASPxGridView.css
114 ms
bomgar.css
115 ms
Sprite.css
116 ms
sprite.css
128 ms
styles.css
129 ms
jquery-ui.css
133 ms
Main_v2.css
130 ms
Sprite.css
134 ms
styles.css
156 ms
lt7.css
149 ms
wwwHeader.css
142 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
148 ms
WebResource.axd
145 ms
BasePage.js
145 ms
Main.js
155 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
237 ms
DXR.axd
194 ms
DXR.axd
216 ms
DXR.axd
195 ms
DXR.axd
197 ms
DXR.axd
194 ms
DXR.axd
180 ms
outdatedbrowser.min.js
156 ms
ga.js
86 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
logo-white-transparent.png
71 ms
edtButtonBack.gif
51 ms
WebResource.axd
52 ms
WebResource.axd
51 ms
menu.aspx
44 ms
Home.aspx
42 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
collect
16 ms
sprite.css
16 ms
styles.css
18 ms
ASPxCommon.css
14 ms
ASPxGridView.css
16 ms
bomgar.css
20 ms
Sprite.css
15 ms
styles.css
34 ms
sprite.css
35 ms
styles.css
34 ms
jquery-ui.css
32 ms
Main_v2.css
35 ms
Sprite.css
33 ms
lt7.css
49 ms
wwwHeader.css
48 ms
BasePage.js
47 ms
Menu.js
74 ms
DXR.axd
77 ms
DXR.axd
73 ms
collect
95 ms
collect
116 ms
Notice.aspx
47 ms
book_64.png
56 ms
changelog_64.png
56 ms
fa-comment-32.png
37 ms
fa-envelope-32.png
53 ms
refresh_64.png
54 ms
session_64.png
55 ms
home_16.png
56 ms
DXR.axd
57 ms
transparentPixel.png
57 ms
sprite.png
58 ms
Home.aspx
17 ms
tracker.bomgar.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tracker.bomgar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tracker.bomgar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tracker.bomgar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tracker Bomgar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: