933 ms in total
128 ms
633 ms
172 ms
Visit annualreview.cushwake.com now to see the best up-to-date Annualreview Cushwake content for Singapore and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about annualreview.cushwake.com
Visit annualreview.cushwake.comWe analyzed Annualreview.cushwake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 805 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
annualreview.cushwake.com performance score
128 ms
111 ms
102 ms
112 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Annualreview.cushwake.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (268 ms) belongs to the original domain Annualreview.cushwake.com.
Page size can be reduced by 643.0 kB (29%)
2.2 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Annualreview.cushwake.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Annualreview Cushwake images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 408.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 408.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Annualreview.cushwake.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (47%)
47
25
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Annualreview Cushwake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
annualreview.cushwake.com
128 ms
default_2015.css
111 ms
orbit-1.2.3.css
102 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
112 ms
lush.min.css
126 ms
lush.animations.css
133 ms
default_2013.js
87 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
131 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
129 ms
jquery.lush.js
174 ms
dropdown.js
156 ms
news.css
155 ms
swfobject.js
65 ms
spinners.js
184 ms
lightview.js
195 ms
lightview.css
168 ms
jquery.hoverizr.min.js
166 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
194 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
194 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
48 ms
jgestures.js
248 ms
addthis_widget.js
87 ms
css
27 ms
9QCBVh5lYUzIUw5Y0GO2jqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
187TYb8ysVvxar86IcDsZ3YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
88 ms
TNtGAwzXtCEY_5hzRlIJNHYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
88 ms
nHiQo1BypvYzt95zlPq1TnYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
87 ms
cw-logo.png
82 ms
ico-home.png
81 ms
home-bg.jpg
165 ms
home-headline-1.png
164 ms
home-bg2.jpg
170 ms
home-headline-2.png
164 ms
home-bg3.jpg
167 ms
home-headline-3.png
164 ms
home-bg4.jpg
268 ms
home-headline-4.png
169 ms
home-bg5.jpg
214 ms
home-headline-5.png
212 ms
home-bg6.jpg
218 ms
home-headline-6.png
215 ms
banner-no-repeat-red.png
215 ms
book-icon.gif
216 ms
facebook.gif
226 ms
twitter.gif
217 ms
linkedin.gif
226 ms
analytics.js
72 ms
300lo.json
66 ms
sprite.png
69 ms
blank.gif
71 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
72 ms
collect
20 ms
annualreview.cushwake.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Annualreview.cushwake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Annualreview.cushwake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
annualreview.cushwake.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Annualreview Cushwake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: