6.9 sec in total
599 ms
5.9 sec
344 ms
Welcome to cadr.sa homepage info - get ready to check Cadr best content right away, or after learning these important things about cadr.sa
Welcome to Cadr Web Solutions (Design, development and Hosting)! We don't only develop, we add charisma to web for a better Internet experience!
Visit cadr.saWe analyzed Cadr.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 599 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
cadr.sa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
93/100
10%
Value1.6 s
99/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
599 ms
95 ms
174 ms
182 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Cadr.sa, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) belongs to the original domain Cadr.sa.
Page size can be reduced by 105.6 kB (18%)
594.9 kB
489.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Cadr.sa main page is 594.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 534.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cadr needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (50%)
58
29
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cadr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cadr.sa
599 ms
language-selector.css
95 ms
navigation.css
174 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
182 ms
cms-navigation.css
187 ms
scx.basic.reset.css
188 ms
scx.icons.css
188 ms
scx.basic.css
198 ms
Defaults.css
259 ms
jquery.js
366 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
279 ms
widgetkit-3714d4a7.css
281 ms
widgetkit-1c9b78b6.js
282 ms
template-48d93cb6.css
429 ms
template-e1acbc1e.js
350 ms
twemoji.min.js
6 ms
scx.polyfill.js
392 ms
firebase.min.js
568 ms
scx.firebase.js
392 ms
scx.app.js
447 ms
scx.frontend.ui.js
463 ms
wp-embed.min.js
466 ms
sitepress.js
498 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
431 ms
lightbox.js
135 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
163 ms
spotlight.js
175 ms
laptop.png
275 ms
iphone1.png
338 ms
iphone2.png
268 ms
resha1.png
379 ms
resha2.png
391 ms
resha3.png
269 ms
resha4.png
367 ms
tablet.png
455 ms
bg2.jpg
833 ms
cadr.woff
415 ms
server.php
721 ms
logo.png
448 ms
radial_gradient.svg
512 ms
ga.js
126 ms
slideshow.js
283 ms
slideset.js
310 ms
tweet_button.html
38 ms
fastbutton
107 ms
widgets.js
36 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
rs=AGLTcCN1yeYqLWodvubIHJYf_WFhd-BjWg
4 ms
like.php
197 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
141 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
159 ms
4-72ea6db99a.jpg
94 ms
5-384cbcd315.jpg
91 ms
6-e2987f98c5.jpg
89 ms
7-cbb7dfcbd6.jpg
94 ms
8-d751a81b3c.jpg
174 ms
9-d2a0dd6293.jpg
180 ms
ressource.php
285 ms
ressource.php
318 ms
lazyload.1.0.4.min.js
96 ms
cadr.sa accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cadr.sa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
cadr.sa SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cadr.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cadr.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cadr.sa
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cadr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: