Tools & Wizards About Us
candlewacks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

candlewacks.com

Page Load Speed

21.8 sec in total

First Response

528 ms

Resources Loaded

20.8 sec

Page Rendered

446 ms

candlewacks.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to candlewacks.com homepage info - get ready to check Candlewacks best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about candlewacks.com

Discount Candles! Scented Candles, Holders, Wholesale supply, cheap favors! - scented candles, christmas and other holidays. Gifts at Cheap wholesale with Discount! Holder and Gel now available!

Visit candlewacks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Candlewacks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 21.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

candlewacks.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

candlewacks.com

528 ms

bn-elist.gif

306 ms

tracker.php

20262 ms

id=2575606&size=1024&colors=32&referer=&java=false

90 ms

counter.js

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Candlewacks.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Assets.bravenet.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Stats.directnic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Stats.directnic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.4 kB (45%)

Content Size

67.7 kB

After Optimization

37.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Candlewacks.com main page is 67.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 36.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 36.4 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 638 B

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 15.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Candlewacks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 15.1 kB
  • After minification 15.1 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Candlewacks. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

candlewacks.com

candlewacks.com

528 ms

bn-elist.gif

bn-elist.gif

306 ms

tracker.php

tracker.php

20262 ms

id=2575606&size=1024&colors=32&referer=&java=false

id=2575606&size=1024&colors=32&referer=&java=false

90 ms

counter.js

counter.js

130 ms

star.gif

star.gif

136 ms

holiday-banner.jpg

holiday-banner.jpg

337 ms

title_glow.gif

title_glow.gif

340 ms

title_10.gif

title_10.gif

280 ms

uniquefavors.gif

uniquefavors.gif

278 ms

top_1a.gif

top_1a.gif

278 ms

top_1b3.gif

top_1b3.gif

272 ms

top_1b.gif

top_1b.gif

339 ms

top_1c.gif

top_1c.gif

347 ms

shadow_1.gif

shadow_1.gif

383 ms

labelLeft.gif

labelLeft.gif

368 ms

divider.gif

divider.gif

496 ms

main_bg3.gif

main_bg3.gif

590 ms

shadow_2.gif

shadow_2.gif

426 ms

babyfoodjar-4ozpink-95.gif

babyfoodjar-4ozpink-95.gif

530 ms

apothecary-new-95.gif

apothecary-new-95.gif

1025 ms

1flag-freecandle.gif

1flag-freecandle.gif

1024 ms

8-jartarts.gif

8-jartarts.gif

1023 ms

citronella-frosted-100.gif

citronella-frosted-100.gif

1027 ms

pillar-soyhemp100.gif

pillar-soyhemp100.gif

1042 ms

burner-4birdhouses-95.gif

burner-4birdhouses-95.gif

1132 ms

sachet_100.gif

sachet_100.gif

1153 ms

floaters-snowflakes100b.gif

floaters-snowflakes100b.gif

1904 ms

bottom_1a.gif

bottom_1a.gif

2106 ms

bottom_middle.gif

bottom_middle.gif

2106 ms

bottom_1c.gif

bottom_1c.gif

1527 ms

thank_you.gif

thank_you.gif

1209 ms

t.php

t.php

104 ms

Accessibility Review

candlewacks.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

candlewacks.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

candlewacks.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Candlewacks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Candlewacks.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

candlewacks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Candlewacks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: