Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

caparol.lt

Dažai ir emalės - Caparol

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

238 ms

caparol.lt screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Caparol content for Lithuania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about caparol.lt

Dažai ir emalės, fasadų ir šiltinimo sistemos, objektai ir kiti produktai. Caparol yra statybinių dangų rinkos lyderis Vokietijoje ir Australijoje.

Visit caparol.lt

Key Findings

We analyzed Caparol.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

caparol.lt performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.392

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.caparol.lt

1655 ms

stylesheet_1cc8bf8cf7.css

195 ms

main.css

192 ms

menu.css

194 ms

powermail.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Caparol.lt, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Caparol.lt.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 452.1 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Caparol.lt main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 20.6 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 91.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Caparol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 243.4 kB

  • Original 361.2 kB
  • After minification 335.8 kB
  • After compression 117.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 102.1 kB

  • Original 122.4 kB
  • After minification 96.8 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Caparol.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (45%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Caparol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

caparol.lt accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

caparol.lt best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

caparol.lt SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LT

  • Language Claimed

    LT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caparol.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Caparol.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Caparol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: