3.7 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.2 sec
199 ms
Welcome to ccofr.org homepage info - get ready to check Ccofr best content right away, or after learning these important things about ccofr.org
Visit ccofr.orgWe analyzed Ccofr.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ccofr.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
1318 ms
136 ms
273 ms
23 ms
350 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Ccofr.org, 28% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ccofr.org.
Page size can be reduced by 517.9 kB (50%)
1.0 MB
518.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ccofr.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 641.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ccofr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 434.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 434.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ccofr.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (69%)
39
12
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ccofr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ccofr.org
1318 ms
styles.css
136 ms
style.css
273 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.js
350 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
142 ms
comment-reply.min.js
141 ms
tinynav.js
268 ms
backtotop.js
296 ms
jsapi
17 ms
cgmp.framework.min.js
283 ms
jquery.form.min.js
238 ms
scripts.js
398 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
430 ms
attitude-slider-setting.js
399 ms
social-icons.png
157 ms
search.png
152 ms
IMG_4517-1038x460.jpg
490 ms
pix_184014-1024x460.jpeg
348 ms
transparent.png
150 ms
directions.png
237 ms
loading.gif
239 ms
back-to-top.png
245 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
30 ms
OttjxgcoEsufOGSINYBGLZ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
31 ms
style.css
288 ms
js
50 ms
common.js
20 ms
map.js
18 ms
util.js
68 ms
geocoder.js
67 ms
geometry.js
66 ms
directions.js
66 ms
onion.js
17 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
52 ms
infowindow.js
27 ms
css
20 ms
marker.js
17 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
120 ms
GeocodeService.Search
119 ms
stats.js
13 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
6 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
9 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
10 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
10 ms
1-default.png
70 ms
ccofr.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ccofr.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ccofr.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ccofr.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ccofr.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ccofr.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ccofr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: