Tools & Wizards About Us
cdiw.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

cdiw.org

Loading...

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

378 ms

Resources Loaded

917 ms

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

cdiw.org screenshot

About Website

Visit cdiw.org now to see the best up-to-date Cdiw content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cdiw.org

Read daily on the hot topics in the real estate industry as well as the latest trends in social media.

Visit cdiw.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cdiw.org page load time and found that the first response time was 378 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cdiw.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

cdiw.org

378 ms

style.css

82 ms

responsive.css

57 ms

jquery.js

133 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Cdiw.org, 32% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 14% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (378 ms) belongs to the original domain Cdiw.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 503.8 kB (53%)

Content Size

944.8 kB

After Optimization

441.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cdiw.org main page is 944.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 312.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 33.5 kB

  • Original 48.5 kB
  • After minification 45.7 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 312.8 kB
  • After minification 272.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cdiw needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 196.4 kB

  • Original 302.3 kB
  • After minification 301.9 kB
  • After compression 105.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 234.0 kB

  • Original 281.2 kB
  • After minification 270.2 kB
  • After compression 47.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cdiw.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (25%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cdiw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cdiw.org

cdiw.org

378 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

57 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

133 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

60 ms

script.js

script.js

35 ms

responsive.js

responsive.js

56 ms

M4_x75M0S3Q

M4_x75M0S3Q

90 ms

sTsh5uJOBpY

sTsh5uJOBpY

103 ms

first-nations-medical-marijuana.jpg

first-nations-medical-marijuana.jpg

97 ms

back.png

back.png

108 ms

cropped-readers-daily.png

cropped-readers-daily.png

37 ms

SEO-strategy-for-big-brands-1024x864.jpg

SEO-strategy-for-big-brands-1024x864.jpg

127 ms

yDr9-Yx9ZF8

yDr9-Yx9ZF8

54 ms

rY9zjr9T_WI

rY9zjr9T_WI

60 ms

Mw2Qchg5gNw

Mw2Qchg5gNw

80 ms

OHMKqXVJ2UQ

OHMKqXVJ2UQ

79 ms

nOhf0yyVL8s

nOhf0yyVL8s

72 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

81 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

116 ms

base.js

base.js

170 ms

first-nations-medical-marijuana.jpg

first-nations-medical-marijuana.jpg

43 ms

SEO Factors

cdiw.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cdiw.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Cdiw.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cdiw.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cdiw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: