4.6 sec in total
403 ms
3.9 sec
303 ms
Welcome to ceepame.com homepage info - get ready to check Ceepame best content right away, or after learning these important things about ceepame.com
Ceepame : association qui regroupe des écoles préparant au diplôme d’Etat de puéricultrices et au diplôme d’état d’auxiliaires de puériculture.
Visit ceepame.comWe analyzed Ceepame.com page load time and found that the first response time was 403 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ceepame.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value3,760 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.183
66/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
403 ms
1422 ms
312 ms
221 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ceepame.com, 17% (17 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ceepame.com.
Page size can be reduced by 942.0 kB (55%)
1.7 MB
775.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ceepame.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 724.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 284.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 284.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ceepame needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 487.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 487.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ceepame.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (63%)
93
34
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceepame. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ceepame.com
403 ms
www.ceepame.com
1422 ms
system.base.css
312 ms
system.menus.css
221 ms
system.messages.css
232 ms
system.theme.css
339 ms
comment.css
236 ms
date.css
333 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
346 ms
date_repeat_field.css
364 ms
field.css
432 ms
logintoboggan.css
560 ms
node.css
762 ms
search.css
773 ms
user.css
791 ms
views.css
544 ms
ckeditor.css
669 ms
ctools.css
650 ms
superfish.css
673 ms
superfish-vertical.css
763 ms
superfish-navbar.css
793 ms
views_slideshow.css
783 ms
gmap.css
893 ms
layout.css
890 ms
style.css
1573 ms
colors.css
905 ms
print.css
905 ms
jquery.min.js
1024 ms
jquery.once.js
1004 ms
drupal.js
1352 ms
fr_C2XquipYoBUXfqGKhi-r1zZPmnMDUp6AvYIdpujb86E.js
1027 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
1031 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
1120 ms
superfish.js
1167 ms
supersubs.js
1182 ms
supposition.js
1166 ms
sftouchscreen.js
1229 ms
js
44 ms
views_slideshow.js
1309 ms
gmap.js
1095 ms
icon.js
1049 ms
marker.js
1078 ms
highlight.js
1104 ms
poly.js
1123 ms
gmap_markers.js
1119 ms
markerloader_static.js
1095 ms
gmap_marker.js
1018 ms
bartik.js
1091 ms
ga.js
144 ms
bandeau-menu.jpg
568 ms
webfont.js
83 ms
fond-header.jpg
275 ms
lune.png
171 ms
Logo.png
281 ms
espace-etudiant.png
170 ms
espace-adherents.png
173 ms
search2.png
271 ms
Bandeau-marron.jpg
378 ms
Ombre1.png
280 ms
fond-menu-vert.jpg
471 ms
ombre-content.png
378 ms
ensevoirplus.png
379 ms
image-facebook.png
389 ms
image-mail.png
469 ms
image-twitter.png
472 ms
Bandeau-footer.jpg
580 ms
fond-menu-pink.png
473 ms
fond-menu-bleu.png
526 ms
besancon.jpg
471 ms
common.js
39 ms
map.js
39 ms
__utm.gif
99 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
97 ms
util.js
85 ms
marker.js
84 ms
css
64 ms
onion.js
34 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
124 ms
infowindow.js
102 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
102 ms
stats.js
98 ms
controls.js
94 ms
transparent.png
56 ms
css
39 ms
bandeau-menu.jpg
121 ms
besancon.jpg
403 ms
google4.png
53 ms
vt
66 ms
vt
64 ms
vt
54 ms
vt
56 ms
vt
55 ms
mapcnt6.png
56 ms
sv5.png
56 ms
3Jo-2maCzv2QLzQBzaKHV7dOf5GikiuHJiioPSOPnhA.ttf
18 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
30 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
63 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
64 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
64 ms
imgs8.png
25 ms
altred.png
128 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
266 ms
ceepame.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ceepame.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ceepame.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceepame.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ceepame.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ceepame.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ceepame. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: