2.4 sec in total
792 ms
1.4 sec
247 ms
Welcome to celebritylifejournal.com homepage info - get ready to check Celebritylifejournal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about celebritylifejournal.com
Visit celebritylifejournal.comWe analyzed Celebritylifejournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 792 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
celebritylifejournal.com performance score
792 ms
15 ms
47 ms
31 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Celebritylifejournal.com, 36% (16 requests) were made to D62r4m6yn6ctc.cloudfront.net and 9% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (792 ms) belongs to the original domain Celebritylifejournal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 348.0 kB (35%)
998.3 kB
650.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Celebritylifejournal.com main page is 998.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 479.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Celebritylifejournal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 159.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.6 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Celebritylifejournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (31%)
39
27
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Celebritylifejournal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
celebritylifejournal.com
792 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
15 ms
pagenavi-css.css
47 ms
style.css
31 ms
css
44 ms
jquery.js
24 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
20 ms
adsbygoogle.js
16 ms
tie-scripts.js
23 ms
wp-embed.min.js
22 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
loader.js
139 ms
body-bg13.png
138 ms
top-shadow.png
41 ms
black-loader.gif
197 ms
clj-01.png
41 ms
Kiefer-Sutherland-620x320.jpg
74 ms
Leonardo-Dicaprio-620x320.jpg
72 ms
Tom-and-Rita-Hanks-620x320.jpg
41 ms
Jennifer-Lopez1-620x321.jpg
73 ms
howard-stern-300x160.jpg
69 ms
Arnold-Schwarzenneger-70x70.jpg
93 ms
Howard-Stern-70x70.jpg
93 ms
Helen-Mirren-70x70.jpg
96 ms
Kiefer-Sutherland-300x160.jpg
97 ms
Tom-and-Rita-Hanks-70x70.jpg
95 ms
Freddie-Prinz-Jr-300x160.jpg
94 ms
Britney-Spears-70x70.jpg
121 ms
Michael-Connor-Humphreys-70x70.jpg
114 ms
Jonathan_Brandis_Wiki-70x70.jpg
119 ms
ca-pub-9264156771719206.js
87 ms
zrt_lookup.html
168 ms
show_ads_impl.js
102 ms
tiefontello.svg
46 ms
tiefontello.woff
49 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
71 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
75 ms
collect
66 ms
impl.200-RELEASE.js
228 ms
beacon.js
118 ms
collect
55 ms
collect
90 ms
ads
228 ms
osd.js
8 ms
celebritylifejournal.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Celebritylifejournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Celebritylifejournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
celebritylifejournal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Celebritylifejournal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: