Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cemabearing.be

CEMA Bearing - Hoogwaardige lagers voor diverse toepassingen

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

262 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

132 ms

cemabearing.be screenshot

About Website

Visit cemabearing.be now to see the best up-to-date CEMA Bearing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cemabearing.be

CEMA Bearing is de leverancier van hoogwaardige lagers voor diverse toepassingen. Ontdek ons brede assortiment aan kwaliteitslagers en vind de juiste oplossing voor uw toepassing.

Visit cemabearing.be

Key Findings

We analyzed Cemabearing.be page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cemabearing.be performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cemabearing.be

262 ms

cemabearing.be

338 ms

www.cemabearing.be

476 ms

87 ms

en

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Cemabearing.be, 26% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.odoocdn.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Cemabearing.be.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

5.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Cemabearing.be main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 45.3 kB
  • After minification 36.8 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 152.6 kB

  • Original 5.5 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CEMA Bearing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 106.2 kB
  • After minification 106.2 kB
  • After compression 104.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 36.4 kB

  • Original 138.2 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB
  • After compression 101.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cemabearing.be needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (21%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CEMA Bearing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cemabearing.be accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

cemabearing.be best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cemabearing.be SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cemabearing.be can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Cemabearing.be main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CEMA Bearing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: