Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

centex.net

Best Internet and Phone Service Provider in Rural TX | CTTC

Page Load Speed

931 ms in total

First Response

67 ms

Resources Loaded

772 ms

Page Rendered

92 ms

centex.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to centex.net homepage info - get ready to check Centex best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about centex.net

As technology has changed, so has the look and feel of our company, but we have remained the same in providing our customers with the same great service. Request Service!

Visit centex.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Centex.net page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 864 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

centex.net performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

centex.net

67 ms

centex.net

13 ms

www.centex.net

77 ms

e-202420.js

14 ms

lazyload.min.js

611 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Centex.net, 14% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com and 14% (1 request) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (611 ms) belongs to the original domain Centex.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.7 kB (77%)

Content Size

119.6 kB

After Optimization

28.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Centex.net main page is 119.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 108.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 85.8 kB

  • Original 108.0 kB
  • After minification 107.0 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 11.6 kB
  • After minification 11.6 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Centex. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

centex.net accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

centex.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

centex.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Centex.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Centex.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Centex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: