11.8 sec in total
590 ms
4.7 sec
6.5 sec
Welcome to cete.com homepage info - get ready to check Cete best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about cete.com
.NET, Java and COM Libraries for Dynamic PDF tasks: Create, Merger, Split, Form Fill, View, Convert, Print, Save, Watermark and much more! Free Eval of all products
Visit cete.comWe analyzed Cete.com page load time and found that the first response time was 590 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
cete.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.9 s
52/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
590 ms
48 ms
366 ms
364 ms
256 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Cete.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Dynamicpdf.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Cete.com.
Page size can be reduced by 56.1 kB (40%)
140.1 kB
84.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Cete.com main page is 140.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 71.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cete images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cete.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)
53
40
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cete. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
cete.com
590 ms
urchin.js
48 ms
styles.css
366 ms
Support-Visitor-monitor.js.aspx
364 ms
__utm.gif
256 ms
RedirectToDynamicPDF.asp
52 ms
Support-Visitor-monitor.js.aspx
129 ms
SupportCustomerHandler.ashx
662 ms
ceTe_Software_Hdr_Top.jpg
661 ms
live-help-window.gif
629 ms
closechat.gif
627 ms
HdrToBody_Left.gif
591 ms
Dynamic_PDF_Bnr_Home.jpg
694 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Products.gif
590 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_DotNET.gif
591 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Java.gif
672 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_COM.gif
662 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Download.gif
677 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Purchase.gif
657 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Support.gif
646 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Company.gif
630 ms
Left_Bottom.gif
629 ms
Left_Table_Top.jpg
628 ms
Right_Table_Top.jpg
628 ms
Box_Suite_LtBluBG.gif
614 ms
Box_Merger_LtBluBG.gif
614 ms
net1.jpg
613 ms
com_1.jpg
614 ms
java1.jpg
952 ms
Left_Table_Bottom.jpg
580 ms
Right_Table_Bottom.jpg
997 ms
Box_ReportWriter_LtBluBG.gif
991 ms
Box_Generator_LtBluBG.gif
995 ms
Box_Viewer_LtBluBG.gif
854 ms
Box_Rasterizer_LtBluBG.gif
853 ms
h78_bgF3F6FB_Converter.gif
853 ms
Barcode_Logo_Small.gif
854 ms
Right_Bottom.gif
843 ms
HdrToBody_Right.gif
815 ms
Page_Bottom_Curves.gif
815 ms
ceTe_Software_Logo_Bottom.gif
816 ms
Left_Top.gif
1065 ms
Left_Body.gif
928 ms
arrow.jpg
928 ms
Left_Table_Body.jpg
992 ms
Right_Table_Body.jpg
988 ms
Right_Top.gif
988 ms
Right_Body.gif
992 ms
BG_Gradient.gif
769 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Products_Over.gif
306 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_DotNET_Over.gif
202 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Java_Over.gif
202 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_COM_Over.gif
202 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Download_Over.gif
201 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Purchase_Over.gif
201 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Support_Over.gif
234 ms
NavBtn_wBnr_Company_Over.gif
236 ms
cete.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cete.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cete.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cete.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cete.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
cete.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cete. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: