3.4 sec in total
108 ms
2.3 sec
933 ms
Visit chatterpillar.net now to see the best up-to-date Chatterpillar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chatterpillar.net
Whats new in world
Visit chatterpillar.netWe analyzed Chatterpillar.net page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
chatterpillar.net performance score
108 ms
915 ms
116 ms
80 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Chatterpillar.net, 12% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (915 ms) belongs to the original domain Chatterpillar.net.
Page size can be reduced by 421.0 kB (51%)
832.2 kB
411.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Chatterpillar.net main page is 832.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 329.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 97.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 786 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chatterpillar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 212.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 212.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chatterpillar.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (62%)
60
23
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chatterpillar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chatterpillar.net
108 ms
www.chatterpillar.net
915 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
116 ms
wpsb.css
80 ms
plugins.min.css
114 ms
style.min.css
117 ms
css
25 ms
jetpack.css
152 ms
jquery.js
173 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
119 ms
in.js
8 ms
pinit.js
5 ms
platform.js
101 ms
jquery.cycle.js
219 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
111 ms
photon.js
118 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
118 ms
bulan.min.js
223 ms
wp-embed.min.js
220 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
win10.png
726 ms
auda.jpg
67 ms
downloading.jpg
724 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
797 ms
pinit_fg_en_rect_red_28.png
58 ms
sdk.js
58 ms
widgets.js
767 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
56 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
75 ms
fastbutton
664 ms
w9.jpg
665 ms
cropped-chatterpillar-min.jpg
717 ms
hide-l.png
66 ms
left.png
65 ms
hide.png
64 ms
archivetype3.jpg
664 ms
3IFMwfRa07i-auYR-B-zNYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
65 ms
rEy5tGc5HdXy56Xvd4f3I306qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
625 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
715 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
663 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
662 ms
pinit_main.js
619 ms
counter.js
15 ms
655 ms
t.php
702 ms
hovercard.css
213 ms
services.css
278 ms
xd_arbiter.php
154 ms
xd_arbiter.php
235 ms
g.gif
113 ms
postmessageRelay
179 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
75 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
73 ms
count.json
136 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
61 ms
like.php
144 ms
share
346 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
49 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
29 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
64 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
fy8tT2klpgR.js
21 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
14 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
118 ms
fy8tT2klpgR.js
12 ms
jot
76 ms
chatterpillar.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chatterpillar.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chatterpillar.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chatterpillar.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chatterpillar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: