7.8 sec in total
2.2 sec
5.4 sec
172 ms
Click here to check amazing Chcc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chcc.org.uk
Chadwell -
Visit chcc.org.ukWe analyzed Chcc.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
chcc.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value20.5 s
2/100
10%
2214 ms
257 ms
255 ms
37 ms
310 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Chcc.org.uk, 6% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Mycommunitychurch.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (36%)
2.8 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Chcc.org.uk main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chcc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 445.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 445.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 339.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chcc.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 339.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (75%)
85
21
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chcc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mycommunitychurch.org.uk
2214 ms
reset.css
257 ms
960.css
255 ms
css
37 ms
style.css
310 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
414 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
289 ms
formidablepro.css
330 ms
flick.css
438 ms
www.mycommunitychurch.org.uk
1369 ms
nextgen_gallery_related_images.css
420 ms
sbc.css
463 ms
prettyPhoto.css
443 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
534 ms
font-awesome.min.css
18 ms
dashicons.min.css
747 ms
style.css
600 ms
gmw-cl-style-dep.css
589 ms
pagenavi-css.css
553 ms
jquery.tagsinput.css
759 ms
widgets.min.css
668 ms
style-classifieds.css
683 ms
bs.min.css
1042 ms
client.css
829 ms
calendar.css
875 ms
traditional.css
881 ms
player.min.js
855 ms
jquery.js
1152 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
980 ms
include.js
1034 ms
ajax.js
986 ms
persist.js
1230 ms
store.js
1096 ms
ngg_store.js
1159 ms
cp-dynamic-css.js
1215 ms
scrollTo.js
1257 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1267 ms
mailchimp.js
1247 ms
js
43 ms
shailan-dropdown.min.css
1179 ms
flexslider.css
1234 ms
public.css
1233 ms
core.min.js
1187 ms
colours.css
1114 ms
typography.css
1096 ms
datepicker.js
1387 ms
sbc.js
1173 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1173 ms
video-lightbox.js
1141 ms
lightbox_context.js
1104 ms
wpbc_vars.js
1018 ms
jquery.datepick.js
1456 ms
client.js
1259 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1448 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
1017 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1036 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1073 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1208 ms
gmw.min.js
1153 ms
ga.js
32 ms
header_bg.png
642 ms
cc_logo.png
215 ms
main_sprite.png
289 ms
Enough-Slider-Nov.png
268 ms
Easter.png
397 ms
Guest-speakers1.png
979 ms
Alpha-slider.png
871 ms
placer_01.jpg
564 ms
Life-Group-Placer.png
714 ms
IMG_9974a-350x220.jpg
555 ms
10-days-of-prayer-350x220.png
729 ms
20-anniversary-2-e1453117185813.png
852 ms
gmw-loader.gif
780 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
widgets.js
79 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
135 ms
syndication
99 ms
345109352581058560
114 ms
proxy.jpg
17 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
32 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
58 ms
9d5e1f1526adacada74e977989e479a8_normal.jpeg
25 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
143 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
167 ms
proxy.jpg
5 ms
jot.html
29 ms
chcc.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chcc.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
chcc.org.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chcc.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chcc.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chcc.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chcc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: