1.8 sec in total
74 ms
1.4 sec
312 ms
Visit cheatingproof.com now to see the best up-to-date Cheating Proof content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cheatingproof.com
Visit cheatingproof.comWe analyzed Cheatingproof.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
cheatingproof.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.198
62/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
74 ms
21 ms
693 ms
41 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Cheatingproof.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (693 ms) belongs to the original domain Cheatingproof.com.
Page size can be reduced by 145.9 kB (57%)
254.8 kB
108.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Cheatingproof.com main page is 254.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 182.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 217 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cheating Proof images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 102.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.1 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cheatingproof.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (59%)
32
13
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cheating Proof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cheatingproof.com
74 ms
blog
21 ms
693 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
41 ms
widget.css
40 ms
general-99fcf10.css
43 ms
layout-front_page-bb6e2b2.css
44 ms
responsive-grid-d2119e4.css
45 ms
styles.css
59 ms
jquery.js
84 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
61 ms
selectnav.js
61 ms
block-dynamic-js-layout-front_page-6d55f5b.js
64 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
70 ms
responsive-grid-js-e6e6939.js
76 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
jquery.form.min.js
80 ms
scripts.js
80 ms
ca-pub-7593836563377325.js
87 ms
zrt_lookup.html
90 ms
show_ads_impl.js
90 ms
counter.js
10 ms
cheatingproofbanner.jpg
79 ms
cheatingspousesmall.jpg
78 ms
t.php
218 ms
ads
306 ms
osd.js
16 ms
ads
270 ms
m_js_controller.js
22 ms
abg.js
38 ms
favicon
66 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
58 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
44 ms
favicon
77 ms
s
32 ms
x_button_blue2.png
4 ms
cheatingproof.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cheatingproof.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cheatingproof.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cheatingproof.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cheatingproof.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cheatingproof.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cheating Proof. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: